tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33267945432526864792024-02-19T05:23:55.924-08:00ABLOGGMERATIONCollecting Information WorldwideEthan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.comBlogger277125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-52969762609778435702018-03-14T13:06:00.000-07:002018-03-14T13:07:14.931-07:00Farmed Fish and Dirty SecretsA very important discovery! Eating fish might not be the healthy alternative you once thought. This is a compelling documentary that you should watch because it has a lot of information that could possibly save your life or at the very least make an important dietary decision.<br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-family: "roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-family: "roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">Farmed Norwegian Salmon : </span><span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-family: "roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">The World’s Most Toxic Food</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-family: "roboto" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">By Chef Marcus Guiliano</span><br />
<a href="https://www.blogger.com/goog_410369627"><br /></a>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #1d2129; font-family: "helvetica" , "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYYf8cLUV5E">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYYf8cLUV5E</a></span>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-52754227881753756752017-11-29T23:13:00.000-08:002017-11-29T23:13:02.106-08:00Find elections in these states.<h1 class="LandingPage_intro-title_OWE" data-reactid="28" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: inherit; color: #3f3f3d; font-family: clear_sansbold, "Segoe UI", HelveticaNeue-Light, sans-serif; font-size: 1.6rem; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.6rem; margin: 1rem 0px 0.5rem; padding: 0px 0px 0px 30px;">
Find elections in these states</h1>
<div>
This is a fantastic website to help voters find there local booth! Click the <a href="http://votersedge.org/" target="_blank">link</a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<a href="http://votersedge.org/" target="_blank"><img alt="Voter’s Edge" src="http://votersedge.org/content/svg/votersedge/votersedge-75.png" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-74232317252753282432017-11-29T23:09:00.002-08:002017-11-29T23:09:35.408-08:00HOW DARK MONEY WORKS <span style="background-color: white; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">A quick guide to a growing force in U.S. politics</span><br />
<span class="hidden-xs" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br /></span>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
When donors give money directly to a campaign, political party, or super PAC, their names and the amounts they have given must be disclosed.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
But dark money is different.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
It comes from groups—typically limited liability corporations (LLCs) or politically active nonprofits—that do not have to disclose their donors. As a result of U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2007 and 2010, those groups can receive unlimited amounts of money from individuals, corporations, and other organizations.</div>
<span class="hidden-xs" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
They can then use that money to pay for television ads and other efforts to influence voters. Often the public doesn't know who is funding those efforts or why they are trying to affect the outcome of an election. That’s why it’s called “dark money.”</div>
<div style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; color: #404041; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
Continue to reading by clicking this: <a href="http://www.darkmoneywatch.org/how-dark-money-works/" target="_blank">link</a></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-33635097169257332682017-11-20T19:53:00.001-08:002017-11-20T19:53:04.434-08:00World Bank declares itself above the lawhttps://www.pambazuka.org/economics/world-bank-declares-itself-above-law<br />
<br />
<div class="field field-name-field-article-date field-type-datetime field-label-hidden" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: "Open Sans", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<div class="field-items" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="field-item even" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<span class="date-display-single" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; margin-right: 10px;">Mar 30, 2017</span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field field-name-field-article-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; font-family: "Open Sans", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600; margin-top: 10px;">
<div class="field-items" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="field-item even" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The World Bank has for decades left a trail of human misery. Destruction of the environment, massive human rights abuses and mass displacement have been ignored in the name of “development” that works to intensify neoliberal inequality. In response to legal attempts to hold it to account, the World Bank has declared itself above the law.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden" style="background-color: white; box-sizing: border-box; clear: none; font-family: "Open Sans", "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<div class="field-items" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div class="field-item even" style="box-sizing: border-box;">
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
At least one U.S. trial court has already agreed that the bank can’t be touched, and thus the latest lawsuit filed against it, attempting to obtain some measure of justice for displaced Honduran farmers, faces a steep challenge. Regardless of the ultimate outcome of legal proceedings, however, millions of people around the world have paid horrific prices for the relentless pursuit of profit.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
A trail of evictions, displacements, gross human rights violations (including rape, murder and torture), widespread destruction of forests, financing of greenhouse-gas-belching fossil-fuel projects, and destruction of water and food sources has followed the World Bank.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The latest attempt at accountability is a lawsuit filed in the U.S. federal court in Washington by EarthRights International, a human rights and environmental non-governmental organization, charging that the World Bank has turned a blind eye to systematic abuses associated with palm-oil plantations in Honduras that it has financed. The lawsuit, <em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><u style="box-sizing: border-box;">Juana Doe v. International Finance Corporation</u></em>, alleges that,</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
“Since the mid-1990s, the International Finance Corporation [a division of the World Bank] has invested millions of dollars in Honduran palm-oil companies owned by the late Miguel Facussé. Those companies — which exist today as Dinant — have been at the center of a decades-long and bloody land-grabbing campaign in the Bajo Aguán region of Honduras.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
For nearly two decades, farmer cooperatives have challenged Dinant’s claims to sixteen palm-oil plantations … that it has held in the Bajo Aguán region. On information and belief, Dinant’s former owner, Miguel Facussé, took that land from the farmer cooperatives through fraud, coercion, and actual or threatened violence. The farmer cooperatives have engaged in lawsuits, political advocacy, and peaceful protests to challenge Dinant’s control and use of the land. And Dinant has responded to such efforts with violence and aggression.”</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">Bank’s own staff cites failures</strong></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
EarthRights International alleges that the World Bank has “repeatedly and consistently provided critical funding to Dinant, knowing that Dinant was waging a campaign of violence, terror, and dispossession against farmers, and that their money would be used to aid the commission of gross human rights abuses.” The lawsuit filing cites “U.S. government sources” to allege that more than 100 farmers have been killed since 2009.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The suit also says that the International Finance Corporation’s own ombudsman said the World Bank division “failed to spot or deliberately ignored the serious social, political and human rights context.” These failures arose “from staff incentives ‘to overlook, fail to articulate, or even conceal potential environmental, social and conflict risk’ and ‘to get money out the door.’ ” Despite this internal report, the suit says, the World Bank continued to provide financing and that the ombudsman has “no authority to remedy abuses.”</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
(World Bank representatives did not respond to a request for comment. Although not directly a party to the lawsuit, Dinant describes the allegations as “absurd.” In a <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">statement on its web site</u>, the company said “All allegations that Dinant is — or ever has been — engaged in systematic violence against members of the community are without foundation.”)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
EarthRights International’s lawsuit faces an uphill challenge due to an earlier suit filed by it on behalf of Indian farmers and fisherpeople being thrown out by the same court when it ruled that the World Bank is <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">immune from legal challenge</u>. The bank provided $450 million for a power plant that the plaintiffs said degraded the environment and destroyed livelihoods. The court agreed with the World Bank’s <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">contention that it has immunity</u> under the International Organizations Immunities Act. (The dismissal has been appealed.)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">International Organizations Immunities Act</u> provides that “International organizations, their property and their assets, wherever located, and by whomsoever held, shall enjoy the same immunity from suit and every form of judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments.” The World Bank has been declared the equivalent of a sovereign state, and in this context is placed above any law as if it possesses diplomatic immunity.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
This law is applied selectively; lawsuits against Cuba are not only allowed but consistently won by plaintiffs. These are <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">not necessarily the strongest</u> of cases, such as participants in the Bay of Pigs invasion winning judgments and a woman who was married to a Cuban who went back to Cuba winning $27 million because the court found that her marriage made her a “victim of terrorism”!</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">More than 3 million people displaced</strong></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Despite its immunity, a passport may not be needed to enter a World Bank office, but can it be argued that the lending organization uses its immense power wisely? That would be a very difficult case to make.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
A 2015 report by the <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">International Consortium of Investigative Journalists</u> found that 3.4 million people were physically or economically displaced by projects funded by the World Bank. Land was taken, people were forced from their homes and their livelihoods damaged. Some of the other findings of the report, on which more than 50 journalists from 21 countries worked:</div>
<ul style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 11px; padding: 0px;">
<li style="box-sizing: border-box; list-style: initial; margin-left: 20px;">From 2009 to 2013, the World Bank pumped $50 billion into projects graded the highest risk for “irreversible or unprecedented” social or environmental impacts — more than twice as much as the previous five-year span.</li>
<li style="box-sizing: border-box; list-style: initial; margin-left: 20px;">The bank regularly fails to live up to its own policies that purport to protect people harmed by projects it finances.</li>
<li style="box-sizing: border-box; list-style: initial; margin-left: 20px;">The World Bank and its International Finance Corporation lending arm have financed governments and companies accused of human rights violations such as rape, murder and torture. In some cases, they continued to bankroll these borrowers after evidence of abuses emerged.</li>
<li style="box-sizing: border-box; list-style: initial; margin-left: 20px;">Ethiopian authorities diverted millions of dollars from a World Bank-supported project to fund a violent campaign of mass evictions, according to former officials who carried out the forced resettlement program.</li>
</ul>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
One of the articles that is a part of this investigative report said the bank routinely ignores its own rules that require detailed resettlement plans and that employees face strong pressure to approve big infrastructure projects. <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">The report says</u>:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
“The World Bank often neglects to properly review projects ahead of time to make sure communities are protected, and frequently has no idea what happens to people after they are removed. In many cases, it has continued to do business with governments that have abused their citizens, sending a signal that borrowers have little to fear if they violate the bank’s rules, according to current and former bank employees.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
‘There was often no intent on the part of the governments to comply — and there was often no intent on the part of the bank’s management to enforce,’ said Navin Rai, a former World Bank official who oversaw the bank’s protections for indigenous peoples from 2000 to 2012. ‘That was how the game was played.’ …</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Current and former bank employees say the work of enforcing these standards has often been undercut by internal pressures to win approval for big, splashy projects. Many bank managers, insiders say, define success by the number of deals they fund. They often push back against requirements that add complications and costs.”</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">Funding that facilitates global warming</strong></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Incredibly, one of the outcomes of the Paris Climate Summit was for leaders of the G7 countries <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">to issue a communiqué</u> that they would seek to raise funds “from private investors, development finance institutions and multilateral development banks.” These leaders propose the World Bank be used to fight global warming despite it being a major contributor to projects that increase greenhouse-gas emissions, including providing billions of dollars to finance new coal plants around the world. The bank even had the monumental <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">hypocrisy to issue a report</u> in 2012 that called for slowing global warming while ignoring its own role.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
It is hoped you, dear reader, won’t fall off your chair in shock, but the World Bank’s role in facilitating global warming has since only increased.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Financing projects that facilitate global warming had already been on the rise. A <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">study prepared by the Institute for Policy Studies</u> and four other organizations found that World Bank lending for coal, oil and gas reached $3 billion in 2008 — a sixfold increase from 2004. In the same year, only $476 million went toward renewable energy sources. Oil Change International (citing somewhat lower dollar figures) estimates that World Bank <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">funding for fossil fuels</u>doubled from 2011 to 2015.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Destructive logging projects across the Global South funded by the World Bank <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">accelerated in the 1990s</u>. Despite a January 2000 internal report finding that its lending practices had not curbed deforestation or reduced poverty, <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">Southeast Asia saw a continuation</u> of illegal logging and land concessions, and untimely deaths of local people blowing the whistle, <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">as has Africa</u>.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Similar to its report on curbing global warming that ignores its own role, the World Bank shamelessly <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">issued a 2012 report</u> calling for international law enforcement measures against illegal logging. Perhaps what is illegal are only those operations not funded by the bank?</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">Loans to pay debt create more debt, repeat</strong></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Ideology plays a critical role here. International lending organizations, such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, consistently impose austerity. The IMF’s loans, earmarked for loans to governments to pay debts or stabilize currencies, always come with the same requirements to privatize public assets (which can be sold far below market value to multi-national corporations waiting to pounce); cut social safety nets; drastically reduce the scope of government services; eliminate regulations; and open economies wide to multi-national capital, even if that means the destruction of local industry and agriculture. This results in more debt, which then gives multi-national corporations and the IMF, which enforces those corporate interests, still more leverage to impose more control, including heightened ability to weaken environmental and labor laws.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The World Bank compliments this by <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">funding massive infrastructure projects</u> that tend to enormously profit deep-pocketed international investors but ignore the effects on local people and the environment.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
The World Bank employs a large contingent of scientists and technicians, which give it a veneer of authority as it pursues a policy of relentless corporate plunder. Noting that the bank possesses “an enormous research and knowledge generation capacity,” The environmental and social-justice organization <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">ASEED Europe reports</u>:</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
“The World Bank is the institution with one of the largest research budgets globally and has no rival in the field of development economics. … A number of researchers and scholars have questioned the reliability of the World Bank-commissioned research. Alice Amsdem, a top scholar on East Asian economies, argues that since the World Bank continually fails to scientifically prove its conclusions, its policy justifications are ‘quintessentially political and ideological.’ Regarding the World Development Report (WDR) series, for example, Nicholas Stern, an Oxford professor in economics and former World Bank chief economist says that many of the numbers used by the Bank come from highly dubious sources, or have been constructed in ways which leaves one sceptical as to whether they can be helpfully applied.” (citations omitted)</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Capitalist ideology rests on the concept of “markets” being so efficient that they should be allowed to <u style="box-sizing: border-box;">work without human intervention</u>. But what is a market? Under capitalism, it is nothing more than the aggregate interests of the most powerful and largest financiers and industrialists. No wonder that “markets” “decide” that neoliberal austerity must be ruthlessly imposed — it is those at the top of vast corporate institutions who benefit from the decisions that the World Bank, and similar institutions, consistently make.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
Markets do not sit in the clouds, beyond human control, as some perfect mechanism. They impose the will of those with the most who can not ever have enough. Markets are not ordained by some higher power — everything of human creation can be undone by human hands. Our current world system is no exception.</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">* Pete Dolack</strong><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;"> writes the </strong><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a href="http://systemicdisorder.wordpress.com/" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">Systemic Disorder</a></em><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;"> blog and has been an activist with several groups. His book, </strong><em style="box-sizing: border-box;"><a href="http://www.zero-books.net/books/its-not-over" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">It’s Not Over: Learning From the Socialist Experiment</a></em><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;">, is available from Zero Books.</strong><strong style="box-sizing: border-box;"> This article previously appeared in <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/03/24/world-bank-declares-itself-above-the-law/" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">Counterpunch</a>.</strong></div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
* THE VIEWS OF THE ABOVE ARTICLE ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE PAMBAZUKA NEWS EDITORIAL TEAM</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
* BROUGHT TO YOU BY PAMBAZUKA NEWS</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
* Please do not take Pambazuka for granted! Become a <a href="http://www.pambazuka.org/en/friends.php" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">Friend of Pambazuka</a> and make a donation NOW to help keep Pambazuka FREE and INDEPENDENT!</div>
<div style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;">
* Please send comments to [email=<a href="mailto:editor@pambazuka.org" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">editor@pambazuka.org</a>]editor[at]pambazuka[dot]org[/email] or comment online at <a href="http://www.pambazuka.org/" style="background: transparent; box-sizing: border-box; color: #cc3300; text-decoration-line: none;">Pambazuka News</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-27707997576046745392017-03-13T01:00:00.002-07:002017-03-13T01:00:25.879-07:00Fukushima Radiation Makes Landfall On US West Coast!<span style="background-color: #eeeeee; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px;">Fukushima Radiation Makes Landfall On US West Coast – And It’s Only The Beginning</span><span style="background-color: #eeeeee; border: 0px; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /><span class="post-info-text" style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">By</span> <span class="author-name vcard fn" itemprop="author" style="border: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 3px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Whitney Webb</span><span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span></span><br />
<div align="left" style="background-color: #eeeeee; border: 0px; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
After <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-the-entire-pacific-ocean-and-its-going-to-get-worse/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">the catastrophic triple meltdown</a> of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011, the Japanese government and the plant’s parent company, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fukushima-tepco-power-japan-nuclear-meltdown-apologizes-cover-up/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">worked to cover up the damage</a> done and downplay the amount of radiation the disaster had released into the environment. Though the disaster’s <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/japan-recognizes-first-thyroid-cancer-case-as-fukushima-related-offers-compensation/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">many impacts</a> have been suspiciously absent from mainstream media reports in the years since, the radiation pouring out of the plant’s damaged reactors have never stopped. To this day, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-fukushima-pm-idUSBRE97601K20130807" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">300 tons of contaminated, radioactive water</a> flow into the Pacific Ocean <strong style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">every day</strong> as many of the leaks can never be sealed due to the extreme heat. Now, nearly six years after the meltdown, radiation from Fukushima <a href="http://www.environews.tv/121216-seaborne-cesium-134-fukushima-makes-landfall-us-1st-time-oregon-coast/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">has made landfall</a> on the West coast of the United States, signaling a dangerous new era for residents and wildlife along the Pacific coastal region.</div>
<div align="left" style="background-color: #eeeeee; border: 0px; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Researchers from <a href="http://www.whoi.edu/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI)</a>, a crowd-funded team of scientists, announced yesterday that they had detected, for the first time, seaborne cesium 134 in seawater on the shores of Tillamook Bay in Oregon. The group has been monitoring the waterborne radiation as it extends from Fukushima across the Pacific for years. According to WHOI as well as other scientists, cesium 134, a dangerous and carcinogenic radioactive isotope, could only have originated from the Fukushima disaster due to its short half-life, or rate of decay.</div>
<span style="background-color: #eeeeee; border: 0px; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br />The samples themselves contained 0.3 becquerels/m<span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">3</span> of the isotope, a relatively small amount that some researchers and corporate media outlets say poses “no risk to humans or the environment.” However, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/06/29/radiation-in-our-food.html" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">there is no such thing as “safe” amounts of radiation</a>, which is particularly true of radioactive cesium as it imitates potassium within the body. Japanese citizens were also told there was nothing to worry about, despite the fact that <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/japan-recognizes-first-thyroid-cancer-case-as-fukushima-related-offers-compensation/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">cancer rates have spiked</a> since the incident. The real and unstated danger here is that of bioaccumulation. Bioaccumulation refers to the gradual build-up over time of chemicals in an organism, absorbing the substance at a faster rate than it is excreted. Now, that Fukushima radiation has reached the US, those living on the West Coast or eating fish from that region could be at risk if they consume radioactive water or fish as all consumed cesium would remain in their body, continuously causing damage until it is excreted. Children are said to be especially at risk. Another reason why there is cause for concern is that these samples were actually collected in January 2016 and not tested until recently, suggesting that landfall may have happened earlier than thought. This, in turn, would also mean that higher levels of cesium as more of Fukushima’s radiation has made contact with Western coastal shores in the months since as researchers have said that radiation will not “peak” until well after the plume’s initial landfall.<span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span><br />No matter how often the Japanese government, TEPCO, or the corporate media say that radiation from Fukushima is nothing to worry, ignoring a problem does not make it go away. The world’s oceans, particularly the Pacific Ocean, are in the midst of an unprecedented crisis as <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/sperm-whales-found-dead-in-germany-stomachs-full-of-plastic-and-car-parts/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">mass die-offs</a> of fish and <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/the-great-barrier-reef-and-the-real-danger-to-the-worlds-oceans/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">coral</a> are signaling that something is horribly wrong. These trends, combined with the devastating effects of over-fishing, led the World Wildlife Fund to <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/wwf-warns-all-fish-may-go-extinct-within-next-30-years/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">recently warn that all marine life</a> could die out before the year 2050, less than forty years from now. It is incredible that a nuclear disaster that has leaked 300 tons of radioactive water into the ocean every day for the last five years could have no effect on the massive environmental crisis unfolding before our eyes. Until Fukushima’s consequences are acknowledged and treated with the concern they clearly merit, we will continue to be unable to understand the true scope of the problem.<span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: #eeeeee; border: 0px; font-family: Lato, sans-serif; font-size: 20px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">This article (<a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/fukushima-radiation-makes-landfall-on-us-west-coast-and-its-only-the-beginning/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">Fukushima Radiation Makes Landfall On US West Coast – And It’s Only The Beginning</a>) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;"><em style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Creative Commons</em></a><em style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"> license with attribution to the author and </em><a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;"><em style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">TrueActivist.com</em></a><span style="border: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><br /><br />Read More: <a href="http://www.trueactivist.com/fukushima-radiation-makes-landfall-on-us-west-coast-and-its-only-the-beginning/" style="border: 0px; color: #cd1713; font-weight: 700; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.3s; vertical-align: baseline;">http://www.trueactivist.com/fukushima-radiation-makes-landfall-on-us-west-coast-and-its-only-the-beginning/</a></span><br /></span></span>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-88725225537208532852016-06-21T15:25:00.001-07:002016-06-21T15:30:45.321-07:00Guccifer 2.0 and The Clinton DocumentsHere is the link to the Clinton documents.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/21/hillary-clinton/">https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/21/hillary-clinton/</a><br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #3e4244; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px;">Don’t forget the password: </span><strong style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px;">#GucCi2/0</strong><br />
<br />
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
You can download the archive with all files using any of the links:</div>
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
<span style="color: #66c0ec;"><span style="box-sizing: inherit; transition: 0.3s; word-break: break-word;"><a href="http://www.megafileupload.com/70fa/HRC_pass..zip">http://www.megafileupload.com/70fa/HRC_pass..zip</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
<span style="color: #66c0ec;"><span style="box-sizing: inherit; transition: 0.3s; word-break: break-word;"><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?79a6zy27q9ung">http://www.mediafire.com/?79a6zy27q9ung</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
<span style="color: #66c0ec;"><span style="box-sizing: inherit; transition: 0.3s; word-break: break-word;"><a href="https://guccifer.sharefile.com/d-sbe49b6cdcf94f0a8">https://guccifer.sharefile.com/d-sbe49b6cdcf94f0a8</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
<span style="color: #66c0ec;"><span style="box-sizing: inherit; transition: 0.3s; word-break: break-word;"><a href="http://www.4shared.com/zip/jXY3MvE0ba/HRC_pass.html">http://www.4shared.com/zip/jXY3MvE0ba/HRC_pass.html</a></span></span></div>
<div style="background-color: #3e4244; box-sizing: inherit; color: #e6edf0; font-family: "Alegreya Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; line-height: 30px; margin-bottom: 1.5em;">
<span style="color: #66c0ec;"><span style="box-sizing: inherit; transition: 0.3s; word-break: break-word;"><a href="http://www5.zippyshare.com/v/zj8PZAek/file.html">http://www5.zippyshare.com/v/zj8PZAek/file.html</a></span></span></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-51319553105567326802015-04-05T12:52:00.004-07:002015-04-05T12:52:54.733-07:00Scrubbing Off Pesticides: A Fruits And Veggies Trick<div style="background-color: white; color: #262626; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px; margin-bottom: 23px;">
No one wants to eat pesticides, right? Unfortunately, organic food can be pretty tough to afford, though the good news is that the price is coming down on them. Fruits and vegetables that aren’t grown organically usually come into contact with a variety of different pesticides and chemicals. Even organic produce can be contaminated by neighboring, non-organic fields. There’s really no need to buy an expensive fruit wash and sometimes rinsing with water doesn’t always do the trick. Cold tap water has only been effective in removing about 9 of the 12 most common pesticides. Try this instead:</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #262626; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px; margin-bottom: 23px;">
Mix a half cup of vinegar in a bowl of water and submerge your fruits and veggies for 15 minutes. After that, rinse your produce under running water and wash them thoroughly.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #262626; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px; margin-bottom: 23px;">
At the very least, you should always take the time to rinse off your produce before you eat it, whether it’s organic or conventionally grown. Your produce may seem like it’s clean, but many of the chemicals used as pesticides are tasteless, odorless, and invisible.</div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #262626; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px; margin-bottom: 23px;">
<br /></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #262626; font-family: 'PT Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px; margin-bottom: 23px;">
This article is from <a href="http://simpleorganiclife.org/">http://simpleorganiclife.org</a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; margin-bottom: 23px;">
<span style="color: #262626; font-family: PT Sans, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 23px;"><a href="http://simpleorganiclife.org/rinse-pesticides/">http://simpleorganiclife.org/rinse-pesticides/</a></span></span></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-37480465101842018232015-03-05T21:13:00.002-08:002015-03-05T21:16:09.920-08:00Food Medicine LifeMy dear friend has started up a new website dedicated to living healthy and eating healthy! She is a cancer survivor and after being diagnosed she decided to turn her eating habits and way of living around to help battle this horrible disease. She has amazing advice and wonderful recipes for the vegan and vegetarian diet as well as other information for the discerning person. Please check out her new website by clicking <a href="http://www.foodmedicinelife.com/home.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: red;">here</span></a>.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://nebula.wsimg.com/6f85d650403b262254f9ad390d4f3e3c?AccessKeyId=D71E788BB185FDBC9C61&disposition=0&alloworigin=1" />Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-22759016012116968662015-02-28T23:03:00.000-08:002015-02-28T23:03:04.225-08:0016 Cancer Causing Foods You Probably Eat Every Day<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 620px; word-spacing: 0px;">
1. Microwave Popcorn</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Those little bags of popcorn are so convenient to just stick in the microwave, you wouldn’t think for a minute that they could be dangerous to your health, but they are.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
First, let’s talk about the bag itself. According to <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfluorooctanoic_acid" rel="nofollow" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.2s; border: 0px; color: #3cbe92; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, conventional microwave popcorn bags are lined with a chemical called<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">perfluorooctanoic acid ( PFOA).</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>This is a toxin you can find in Teflon also. According to a<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a class="external" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2679623/" rel="nofollow" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.2s; border: 0px; color: #3cbe92; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; vertical-align: baseline;" target="_blank">recent study</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>at the University of California,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">PFOA<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></strong>is<span style="border: 0px; color: black; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>linked to infertility in women. Numerous studies in lab animals and humans show that exposure to PFOA significantly increases the risk of kidney, bladder, liver, pancreas and testicular cancers. You can read more about this substance and the above mentioned studies at<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a class="external" href="http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/teflon-and-perfluorooctanoic-acid--pfoa" rel="nofollow" style="-webkit-transition: color 0.2s; border: 0px; color: #3cbe92; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; transition: color 0.2s; vertical-align: baseline;">cancer.org</a>.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Now, let’s talk about the contents. Although every manufacturer uses slightly different ingredients, most of them use<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">soybean oil (a GMO product)</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>as well as various preservatives such as<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">propyl gallate</strong>, a chemical that is causes stomach problems and skin rashes. Now they don’t actually say they are using GMO corn kernels, but that’s because the government says they don’t have to. Even if they don’t use GMO corn, you can bet they aren’t using organic corn!</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Also, applied to the popcorn itself, is a chemical called<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">diacetyl</strong>. Use of this chemical caused Conagra Foods to remove it from their brand of popcorn, ACT, because it was causing lung diseases in the workers at their factory.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 620px; word-spacing: 0px;">
2. Non-organic fruits</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Fruits that are non-organic are contaminated with some very dangerous<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">pesticides such as atrazine, thiodicarb, and organophosphates, as well as high nitrogen fertilizers.</strong></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Atrazine is banned in European countries but still used here. This is a weed killer that causes severe problems in humans, especially in our reproductive capabilities.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
A 2009 study found that when pregnant women drank water contaminated with atrazine, their babies had reduced body weights. Were you aware that the sewage from cities in the USA (nicely called bio solids) is used in the fields of farms in the USA as a form of fertilizer? You will never find organic food being cultivated in composted human sewage waste!</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Conventional foods are also subjected to an enormous amount of these types’ chemicals as well as hormones, to make the fruit and veggies grow bigger. Apples are probably the worst offenders with pesticides showing on more than 98 per cent of all apples tested. Fruits with a 90 per cent positive rate of pesticide residue included oranges, strawberries, and grapes.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Washing fruit does not remove 100 per cent of the residue. Pesticides are toxic chemicals to insects as well as human beings.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
3. Canned Tomatoes</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Actually, most canned foods are a concern because of what the can is lined with. The lining of almost all canned foods are made with a chemical called<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">bisphenol-A, or BPA</strong>.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
A study published in May of 2013 by the Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences showed that BPA actually affects the way genes work inside the brain of rats. Even the FDA agrees that there is a problem with BPA as it is supporting efforts to either replace or at the very least, to minimize the amounts found in canned foods. You know it must be bad when even the very lax FDA is concerned!</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Tomatoes are exceptionally dangerous due to their high<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">acidity</strong>, which seems to cause BPA to leech from the lining of the can into the tomatoes themselves. The level of BPA can be so high in fact; you should seriously consider not feeding them to children. Due to FDA laws, there are no standards for labeling BPA so simply because a can does not say it has it does not mean that it does not contain BPA. Be safe and avoid cans. Cook fresh or buy glass bottles.<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #444444; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">What exactly are processed meats? This is a long list that includes, but is not limited to, sausages, hot dogs, bacon, most lunch meats like bologna or pimento loaf.</span></div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
4. Processed Meats</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Researchers who wrote in the journal of BMC Medicine said that the excessive salts and chemicals that are used when making processed meats are damaging to your health. The study showed that 1 in every 17 people who were involved in the study died and those who ate 160 grams or more of processed meats increased their risk of early death as much as 44 percent within 12 years as opposed to those who ate 20 grams or less. This study involved people from 10 European countries and went on for almost 13 years.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
All these processed meats contain numerous<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">chemicals and preservatives, including sodium nitrates</strong>, which make them, look appealing and fresh but are well known carcinogens. Smoking meats seem to be particularly bad as the meat picks up tar from the smoking process. Yes, tar, the same deadly ingredient that cigarette smoke contains.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
5. Farmed Salmon </h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #444444; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Although fish sounds like one of the healthiest foods possible, farmed salmon is one you should avoid. Unfortunately, more than 60 percent of the salmon consumed in the USA is farm raised. </span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
These fish are fed unnatural diets and are contaminated with<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">chemicals, antibiotics, pesticides, and other known carcinogens</strong>. They live in very crowded conditions which results in these fish having 30 times the number of<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">sea lice</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>than wild salmon. (Doesn’t that sound appetizing?) Farmed salmon are fed chemicals to make their meat that reddish pink color that should occur naturally but doesn’t because of the diet of chicken litter that they are fed.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Also, due to their diet, they have less of the healthy omega-3 that we think we are getting when we consume fish. Studies have also shown that farmed salmon contain high levels of<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">PCB’s, mercury, and cancer causing dioxins.</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Avoid farmed salmon and buy it canned or look for labels in your market that state the fish you are buying is wild sockeye salmon.<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #444444; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"> </span></div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
6. Potato Chips</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: #444444; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Yes, we know, potato chips are cheap, great tasting, quick snack, however, the negative effects they have on your body may not be worth the little bit of pleasure you derive from these crispy snacks.</span></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Potato chips are high in both<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">fat and calories</strong>, which are sure to bring on weight gain. A study done in the New England Journal of medicine found that eating just 1 once of potato chips per day caused an average 2 pound weight gain in one year. Besides being full of<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">trans-fats</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>which can cause high cholesterol in most people, they have<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">excessive sodium levels</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>which, for many people, cause high blood pressure.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Potato chips have<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">artificial flavors, numerous preservatives, and colors</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>as well, which is something else your body doesn’t need. Potato chips are fried in high temperatures to make them crispy but this also causes them to make a material called<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">acrylamide, a known carcinogen</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>that is also found in cigarettes.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
It’s hard to say no to your kids demands for chips sometimes, therefore, as a sneaky alternative, buy them baked potato chips or tortilla chips which are at least lower in both fat and calories. Air popped popcorn and whole wheat pretzels are another healthier option. Or try baked apple chips or banana chips which are dehydrated. Both are crispy and are far healthier than regular potato chips.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
7. Hydrogenated oils</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Let’s start from the point that all hydrogenated oils are vegetable oils. Vegetable oils cannot be extracted naturally like butter is, vegetable oils must be<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">chemically removed</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>from their source, and then they are changed to be more acceptable to consumers. They are frequently<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">deodorized and colored</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>to look appealing.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
All vegetable oils contain high levels of Omega–6 fatty acids. An<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">excess of Omega- 6 fatty acids</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>cause health problems, such as heart disease and in increase in various cancers, especially skin cancer. You need a good balance of both Omega 3 and Omega 6. Try to get plenty of Omega 3 every day. You can do this in the form of supplements and grass fed meats, also fatty fish such as salmon and mackerel are a very good source of Omega 3.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Hydrogenated oils are used to preserve processed foods and keep them looking appealing for a long as possible. Hydrogenated oils influence our cell membranes’ structure and flexibility, which is linked to cancer.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
8. Foods that are highly salted, pickled, or smoked</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Foods that are cured by use of<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">nitrates</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>or nitrites act as preservatives as well as adding color to the meat. Although nitrates do not cause cancer in and of themselves, under certain conditions these chemicals change once they are inside the body into N-nitroso composites. It’s this<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">N-nitroso that is associated with a greater increase the risk of developing cancers</strong>.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Smoking foods such as meat or nuts causes these food items to absorb considerable amounts of the tar that smoke produces. Tar is a known carcinogen. Meats such as bacon, sausage, bologna, and salami are high in fat and salt. Pickled foods are also very high in salts.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
There is overwhelming evidence that eating these types of foods greatly increases the risk of colorectal cancer and higher rates of stomach cancer. The rates of stomach cancer are much greater in places such as Japan where a traditional diet contains many foods that are highly salted, and/or smoked.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
9. Highly processed white flours</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Most of you have already heard by now that white flour is not a good thing, but you most likely have no idea just how bad it really is for your health. Refining grains destroys its natural nutrients. Mills are no longer content with waiting for their flour to whiten with time; mills now bleach flour with a chemical called<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">chlorine gas</strong>.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
The EPA states that chlorine gas is a dangerous irritant that is not safe to inhale and in large quantities can be lethal. White flour lurks in many processed foods. White processed flour has a very<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">high glycemic</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>rate which quickly raises the blood sugar level and insulin levels, which can be a direct cause of diabetes, not to mention it is believed that it spreads cancer cells by feeding the cells directly.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Cancerous tumors feed mostly on the sugars in your bloodstream. By avoiding refined grains such as white flour, you can avoid, or at the very least, starve tumors.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
10. GMO’s</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Genetically modified organisms, more commonly called GMO’s, are foods that have been<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">modified by chemicals and grown with chemicals</strong>.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In a study done by Dr. Pusztai at the Rowett Institute in Scotland, rats were fed GMO foods, especially potatoes. ALL rats showed damaged immune systems, pre-cancerous cell growths, along with smaller brains and livers, in just the first 10 days of the project. American consumers believe that the FDA has approved these GMO foods and this is simply not the case.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
The FDA has<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">NO testing procedures</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>for GMO foods, NONE. The only human study ever published showed that those foreign genes that are present in GM food transfer to the DNA in the bacteria in our digestive systems. We, the American consumer, are the guinea pig (or rat) in this case. Unfortunately, almost all grains, including soybeans, wheat, and corn, have been grown via GMO’s.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
GMO’s do not have to be listed on food labels, so read carefully and look for labels that state the food is GMO free.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
11. Refined Sugars</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Refined sugars are not only known to spike<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">insulin levels</strong>, but also to be the most preferable food for<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">cancer cells</strong>, thus promoting their growth.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Cancers seem to have a sweet tooth. This is a known fact that has been around for many years. The Nobel laureate in medicine, German Otto Warburg, back in 1931, first discovered that tumors and cancers both use sugars to “feed” themselves and/or to increase in size. In order to proliferate, cancer cells seem to prefer feeding on fructose-rich sweeteners like high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS); the reason is that HFCS is being metabolized by cancer cells most quickly and easily.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Now it is clear why high-fructose corn syrup is considered the worst offender. And since cakes, pies, cookies, sodas, juices, sauces, cereals, and many other extremely popular, mostly processed, food items are loaded with refined sugars and HFCS in particular, this helps explain why cancer rates are on the rise these days.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
12. Artificial<span class="Apple-converted-space"> Sweetners</span></h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Most people use artificial sweeteners to either lose weight or because they are diabetic and must avoid sugar. The main problem in all this is that there are numerous studies that show people who consume artificial sweeteners on a regular basis, such as in sodas, or coffee sweeteners, actually gain weight. It also does little or nothing to help those with diabetes.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In fact, artificial sweeteners actually make it even more difficult to control their blood sugar levels and worsen conditions that are related to diabetes such as cataracts and gastro paresis. Sometimes<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">aspartame</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>has been found to cause convulsions, which some people will mistake for an insulin reaction.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Not to mention that artificial sweeteners inhibit your body’s ability to monitor its daily calorie consumption and make the body crave even more sweets. Well, we’ve already discussed how refined sugars can cause cancer.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
There is mounting evidence that the chemicals that make up these sweeteners, especially aspartame,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">break down in the body into a deadly toxin called DKP</strong>. When your stomach processes this chemical, it in turn produces chemicals that can cause cancer, especially brain tumors. </div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
13. Diet Anything</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Diet foods, including frozen foods, or prepackaged foods labeled as “diet” or “low fat”, including diet sodas, generally contain<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">aspartame, which is a chemical, artificial sweetener</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>that we talk about in detail above. There are numerous studies showing that aspartame causes many diseases and sicknesses such as cancers, birth defects, and heart problems.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
All “diet” food is chemically processed and made from<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">super refined ingredients, excessive sodium levels, as well as artificial colors</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>and flavors to make it taste good. Don’t ever forget, artificial anything is NOT real food! Although the FDA says that all these added chemicals are safe to eat, you might want to take their advice with a grain of salt. After all, don’t they also tell you that sugar and vegetable oils are safe to eat? (Not to mention GMO’s and fast food!)</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
There have been many studies that show that these additives, for some people, can actually be addicting. They feed that “feel good” part in your brain, similar to cocaine! Well, that actually makes sense because if you become addicted to these foods, the companies making them are certain to score a lot of money, aren’t they?</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Be smart and eat nature’s own, natural “diet” food; fruits and vegetables! (Organic, of course!)</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
14. Alcohol</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
An American study that followed the diet and lifestyles of more than 200,000 women for almost 14 years found that postmenopausal women who drank one drink per day or less had an almost 30 percent increase in breast cancer rates compared to women who did not drink at all.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">Alcohol use is the second leading cause of cancer</strong>, right behind tobacco use. While a moderate or low consumption of alcohol can be healthy and lead to a reduced risk of heart disease, excessive drinking is known to cause heart failure, stroke, and sudden death. In 2007, experts working for the World Health Organizations International Agency for Research on Cancer looked at the scientific evidence regarding cancer and alcohol use from 27 different studies. They found sufficient evidence to state that excessive alcohol use is the main cause of mouth, esophagus, liver, colon, mouth, rectum, and female breast cancers.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Don’t fret! You can still enjoy that glass of wine with dinner, but, for your health’s sake, no more than one!</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
15. Red Meat</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
For those of you, who love your T-bone steak, calm down. There is evidence that shows that red meat is actually a good thing in your diet, in small, infrequent amounts, Grass fed beef contains conjugated linoleic acid that actually fights against certain cancers.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
However, in a study done over a 10 year period, eating red meat every day, even a small amount, such as that quarter pound hamburger you like to enjoy at lunch, increased a man’s risk of dying from cancer by 22 percent and a woman’s chance by 20 percent. A separate research study has shown that eating a lot of red meat increased the risk of breast, prostate, and colon cancer.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Red meat seems particularly dangerous when talking about<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">colon cancer</strong>. A study done in the US followed almost 150,000 people between the ages of 50 and 74. This study showed that the long term consumption of red meat significantly increased the amount of colon cancer found in the subjects studied. On the other hand, the long term consumption of fish and poultry appeared to be protective in nature.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Enjoy that T-bone, but not every night, perhaps not even every week. Save those steaks for a once in while treat and be sure you are consuming grass fed, organic beef for your best health.</div>
<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Open Sans Condensed', sans-serif; font-size: 28px; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: 700; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 32px; margin: 10px 0px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; width: 420px; word-spacing: 0px;">
16. Soda Pop</h2>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Perhaps you heard about the recent study that was published in May in the American Journal of Nutrition? It found that people who consumed more than one soda per day had a higher risk of stroke than people who did not drink sodas.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Loaded with<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">sugar</strong>, sodas are an empty source of calories that cause weight gain and contribute to the nationwide epidemic of obesity. Drinking large amounts of this rapidly digested sugar causes your blood sugar to spike which can lead to both<strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">inflammation and insulin resistance</strong>. Soda is often the root cause of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, which is when the contents of the stomach leak into the esophagus causing not only pain but an actual burning of the esophagus from stomach acid.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Although sodas are not a direct cause of ulcers, they are known to irritate and make those with ulcers have more pain. Sodas also contain<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong style="border: 0px; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">artificial colorings and food chemicals like derivative 4-methylimidazole (4-MI)</strong>; no wonder soda pop has been shown to cause cancer.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
THIS ARTICLE IS FROM </div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<a href="http://naturalon.com/10-of-the-most-cancer-causing-foods/17/" target="_blank">http://naturalon.com/10-of-the-most-cancer-causing-foods/17/ </a></div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #444444; display: block; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; margin: 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<br /></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-89145388527105804882014-09-15T09:53:00.002-07:002014-09-15T09:56:37.414-07:00Pregant Women Eating Good Fish Bad FishThe question of whether to eat fish while pregnant has long been a slippery one. On the one hand, expecting mothers are told that eating fish regularly is good for fetal brain development. And on the other, they’re warned that fish contain mercury, which can cause birth defects.<br />
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Sushi’s obviously out (<a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2famericanpregnancy.org%2fpregnancyhealth%2fsushimercury.htm" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">both bacteria and mercury are an issue</a>), but what about canned tuna and fish sticks? Are shrimp considered fish?<i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/23445" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Mmm … shrimp.</a></i></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Point is, there’s a lot of conflicting information out there. Not surprisingly, many pregnant women have decided to abandon fish altogether—and all the protein and omega-3s that come with it—rather than risk the byproducts. That’s why the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration updated <a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.fda.gov%2fFood%2fFoodborneIllnessContaminants%2fMetals%2fucm393070.htm" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">its recommendations</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>this week.</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In short, if I had to<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nytimes.com%2f2007%2f01%2f28%2fmagazine%2f28nutritionism.t.html%3fpagewanted%3dall%26_r%3d0" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Michael Pollan-ize</a><b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>the agencies' new advice on eating fish, it would be: Eat fish, not too much, and only certain kinds. Easy, right?</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>1. Fish are nutritious and delicious!</b></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Simply stated, the government says the benefits of eating fish outweigh the risks. The government recommends that pregnant women eat two to three servings a week. The same goes for small children, though their portions should obviously coincide with their age and size.</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>2. Some fish are better than others.</b></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Shoppers should choose fish that are low in mercury and methylmercury. These include, but are not limited to: salmon, shrimp, Pollock, light canned tuna, tilapia, catfish, and cod.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fSwedish_Fish" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Swedish fish</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>are safe on the mercury front, too, but they’re not such a great source of Omega-3s (and make for hefty dental bills).</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Unfortunately, the fed's advice doesn't come with<a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fabcnews.go.com%2fHealth%2fwireStory%2ffda-pregnant-women-eat-low-mercury-seafood-24074989" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>any requirements for fishmongers and supermarkets to label their catch-of-the-days with mercury content</a>. That means it’s up to consumers to research and remember what species are safe to eat. You can start by printing out<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nrdc.org%2fhealth%2feffects%2fmercury%2fwalletcard.pdf" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">this card</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>and keeping it in your wallet or purse. And for more low-mercury meal options, check out this<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nrdc.org%2fhealth%2feffects%2fmercury%2fguide.asp" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">in-depth fish list</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>from the Natural Resources Defense Council (which publishes<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>OnEarth</i>).</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>3. Some fish are extra dangerous.</b></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
There’s calculated risk and then there’s just being stupid. Certain species of fish are so chockfull of mercury, the FDA and EPA advise avoiding them altogether. These include tilefish from the Gulf of Mexico, swordfish, king mackerel, and shark. And pregnant or not, you shouldn’t be eating that last one anyway.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2flaughingsquid.com%2fshark-attack-infographic-shows-the-staggering-number-of-sharks-killed-by-humans-every-year%2f" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Sharks have enough problems already</a>.</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>4. “Local” doesn’t always mean “healthy.”</b></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Catching your dinner out of a local stream<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i>seems<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></i>like it would be a step in the right direction. So simple. So natural. So local. But these aren’t simple times. Do you know what lies upstream? Do you know what gets washed or dumped into it? (Polluters aren’t always forthcoming with that information.)</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
So before eating anything you catch yourself, it’s best practice to check to see if those waterbodies have any active fish advisories. And if your po-dunk neck of the woods doesn’t do “fish advisories,” play it safe and eat no more than six ounces of such fish a week. (For kids, that would be 1 to 3 ounces of locally caught fish and then no other kinds of fish for the rest of the week.)</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<b>5. Don’t be a pig about it!</b></div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
The FDA and EPA would like to be clear that this is not a free pass for pregnant women to gorge themselves on shrimp cocktail. (By the way, there are other reasons you may <a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fqz.com%2f219618%2f10-charts-that-explain-why-a-slave-probably-caught-the-shrimp-on-your-grill-this-summer%2f" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">want to forgo shrimp</a>.)</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
“When adding more fish to your diet,” reads<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="https://webmaileast.nrdc.org/owa/redir.aspx?C=D9yXIgjOiEaKNTTcNwrp-GW5BgTbWtEItHP1JRbtjcu4ZOwPJZ5AglXSULqBbvYG3QEmxXGAE54.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.fda.gov%2fFood%2fFoodborneIllnessContaminants%2fMetals%2fucm393070.htm" style="color: #3a8a9c; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">the update</a>, “be sure to stay within your calorie needs.” As with almost all nutritional advice, moderation, moderation, moderation …</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
***This Article is from http://www.onearth.org/</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
http://www.onearth.org/articles/2014/06/what-pregnant-woman-and-everybody-else-should-know-about-eating-fish</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Please Visit and subscribe to their website</div>
<div class="p1" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 22px; margin: 0px 0px 16px; orphans: auto; padding: 0px 8px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
</div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-75334542684723106732014-09-05T17:39:00.003-07:002014-09-05T17:40:34.160-07:00How the New Monopoly Capitalism Will Crush You to Smithereens<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Georgia, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Journalist and author Barry Lynn sounds the alarm about one of the greatest threats to our liberty today.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Georgia, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"><i style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; font-family: Georgia, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"><span class="field field-name-field-date field-type-date field-label-hidden"><span class="field-items"><span class="field-item even"><span class="date-display-single" content="2014-08-14T08:09:00-07:00">August 14, 2014</span></span></span></span></i> </span><br />
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Georgia, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"> </span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Arial, Georgia, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Something wicked has crept into American society, something that many hoped was left back in the dustbins of the 19th century. We’re talking about monopoly, the ogre that screams capitalism run amok. Monopolies, or near-monopolies, as are most common in America, rise up through a lack of competition. When one or a handful of players dominate the marketplace, get ready for higher prices, low-quality products, and crap wages for you and me.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Arial, Georgia, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Arial, Georgia, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Just a few decades ago, this destructive activity would have been illegal. But advocates for small government and faulty market theories successfully drove a complete unraveling of the regulations that used to keep these monsters at bay. The result has been disastrous. Monopolies are back, and they are bigger and nastier than ever.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Arial, Georgia, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: Arial, Georgia, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 25px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">Continue reading <a href="http://www.alternet.org/economy/how-new-monopoly-capitalism-will-crush-you-smithereens" target="_blank">here </a></span> </span>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-14925892180079811762014-08-08T23:33:00.000-07:002014-08-08T23:33:27.527-07:00McDonald's changes their disgusting recipe<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Sorry McDonald's lovers yucky news!!</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
I knew there was a reason why I like Jamie Oliver!!</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Hamburger chef Jamie Oliver has just won a battle against one of the la<span class="text_exposed_show" style="display: inline;">rgest fast food chains in the world. After Oliver showed how McDonald’s hamburgers are made, the franchise announced it will change its recipe.</span></div>
<div class="text_exposed_show" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; display: inline; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 1em 0px;">
According to Oliver, the fatty parts of beef are “washed” in ammonium hydroxide and used in the filling of the burger. Before this process, according to the presenter, the food is deemed unfit for human consumption.</div>
</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
According to the chef and presenter, Jamie Oliver, who has undertaken a war against the fast food industry: “Basically, we’re taking a product that would be sold in the cheapest way for dogs, and after this process, is being given to human beings.”</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Besides the low quality of the meat, the ammonium hydroxide is harmful to health. Oliver calls it “the pink slime process.”</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
“Why would any sensible human being put meat filled with ammonia in the mouths of their children?” asked the chef, who wages a war against the fast food industry.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In one of his initiatives, Oliver demonstrates to children how nuggets are made. After selecting the best parts of the chicken, the remains (fat, skin and internal organs) are processed for these fried foods.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
The company, Arcos Dorados, the franchise manager in Latin America, said such a procedure is not practiced in the region. The same applies to the product in Ireland and the UK, where they use meat from local suppliers.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In the United States, Burger King and Taco Bell had already abandoned the use of ammonia in their products. The food industry uses ammonium hydroxide as an anti-microbial agent in meats, which has allowed McDonald’s to use otherwise “inedible meat.”</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Even more disturbing is that because ammonium hydroxide is considered part of the “component in a production procedure” by the USDA, consumers may not know when the chemical is in their food.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
On the official website of McDonald’s, the company claims that their meat is cheap because, while serving many people every day, they are able to buy from their suppliers at a lower price, and offer the best quality products.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: grey; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 12.288000106811523px; margin: 1em 0px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
In addition, the franchise denied that the decision to change the recipe is related to Jamie Oliver’s campaign. On the site, McDonald’s has admitted that they have abandoned the beef filler from its burger patties.</div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-46242301164445052712014-08-08T23:29:00.000-07:002014-08-08T23:29:00.892-07:006 obscene paydays for the rich that prove the deck is stacked against ordinary Americans<h2 style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: BentonSansCondMedium, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 32px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal !important; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 44px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 5px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Because it's hard to argue that everything's alright when Marissa Mayer gives $100 million to a failed Yahoo exec</h2>
<span class="byline" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; display: inline-block; font-family: BentonSansBold, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 24px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 44px; list-style: none; margin: 5px 0px 8px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 10px 0px 0px; text-align: left; text-decoration: none; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: uppercase; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"><a class="gaTrackLinkEvent" data-ga-track-json="["author","click", "RJ Eskow"]" href="http://www.salon.com/writer/rj_eskow/" rel="author" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: black; font-size: 24px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">RJ ESKOW</a>, ALTERNET</span><span style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background-color: white; color: black; display: inline !important; float: none; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 18px; orphans: auto; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;"></span><br />
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline" />
<div class="editorsNote" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: #333333; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 14.44444465637207px; font-style: italic; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 18px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 0px 0px 15px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
This article originally appeared on<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://www.alternet.org/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 14.44444465637207px; font-weight: bold; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">AlterNet</a>.</div>
<div style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<a href="http://www.alternet.org/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;"><img align="left" alt="AlterNet" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; max-width: 580px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;" /></a></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Economic outcomes aren’t produced in a vacuum. They reflect the politics, culture and values of the people behind them. Today those forces aren’t saying good things about us as a society. Think about it: since when is a failed Silicon Valley executive worth nearly 2,000 times as much as a teacher?</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Yet, sadly, that’s the kind of economy we live in. The money certain types of people command in the marketplace tells us something about our society—and nowadays, it’s not telling us much that’s very good.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Here are six examples of individual incomes which demonstrate that our priorities have gone completely out of whack.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">1. Number Two at Yahoo! gets $109 million for 15 months of failure.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
Okay, run this by me one more time: A human resources expert told Forbes magazine that nine-figure severance packages for Number Twos are “as scarce as golden hen’s teeth.” But Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer still offered a very sweet one to her short-lived second-in-command, Henrique De Castro. It’s worth an estimated $64.5 million, according to <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_24929825/departing-yahoo-exec-may-collect-up-109-million" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">published reports</a>, which means that De Castro’s unsuccessful 15-month tenure will net him an estimated $109 million. De Castro’s golden parachute is “ <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/01/16/fired-yahoo-execs-109m-golden-parachute-was-one-of-the-biggest-ever/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">one of the biggest ever</a>,” according to Forbes’ Jeff Bercovici.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
De Castro’s severance package, which can be seen as a guarantee against personal failure, would have been considered large even for the Number One at a large corporation. It’s especially generous given the fact that the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/17/technology/yahoo-seeks-to-regain-its-touch.html?hpw&rref=technology" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">reports</a> that “Mr. de Castro was particularly ill-suited for the job, according to ad-industry executives, analysts and people who worked with him at Google and Yahoo.”</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
It paid off extremely well for De Castro, whose parachute unfurled less than 15 months after he was hired. As Bercovici notes, De Castro was paid $244,000 each day of his Yahoo! employment, including weekends and his final months, during which he was reportedly rarely on the premises.</div>
<div class="articleContent" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 14.44444465637207px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 18px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<div class="toggle-group target hideOnInit" data-toggle-group="story-13629715" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 14.44444465637207px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; opacity: 1; outline: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The average <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/12/15/how-much-teachers-get-paid-state-by-state/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">teacher’s salary</a> in the United States was $56,383 last year. De Castro’s severance package was more than 1,933 times that amount. He was paid more to go away than America’s teachers are paid to show up—and to grade papers on their weekends, too.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">2. Former Google CEO is reportedly worth $8 billion (and change).</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
How did executive worth get so inflated in Silicon Valley? Consider <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_25068267/google-awards-former-ceo-eric-schmidt-100-million" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">this</a>: de Castro’s (and Mayer’s) former boss Eric Schmidt is reportedly worth $8 billion after serving as Google’s CEO for a number of years. Schmidt famously earned a $1 salary and negligible bonuses while he was CEO, but clearly he was being compensated more than fairly.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
In his current, more nebulous position as “executive chairman,” Schmidt has twice been awarded $100 million in stock. Last month he was also given $6 million in cash.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Schmidt’s a bright guy. But $8 billion and change in net worth? Why, exactly? Schmidt didn’t invent Google. Sergey Brin and Larry Page did. He ran it reasonably well, and deserved to make money for that. But $8 billion? For 10 years’ work?</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
On the “teacher scale” (and with a little estimating for inflation), that’s more than 15,000 times what the average teacher would have made over the same 10-year period.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">3. $19 billion to buy WhatsApp.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
WhatsApp duplicates what instant messaging does, but independently of phone carriers. It’s a good idea, but it’s not revolutionary. While it was well-implemented, by all accounts, its design and execution didn’t require any technical breakthroughs.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Good, competent engineers and managers deserve a good payday for the work. And the WhatsApp team deserves some extra payback, karmic as well as financial, for refusing to accept ads and taking a firmly pro-privacy and anti-Big Data stance. “People need to differentiate us from companies like Yahoo! and Facebook that collect your data and have it sitting on their servers,” said CEO Jan Koum. “We want to know as little about our users as possible.” (They tell us that won’t change—at least for now.)</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But the 55-person WhatsApp team received a lot more than a bright payday and a promising rebirth. At least a dozen business sites have described this deal as “ <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-confirmed-facebooks-19-billion-whatsapp-deal-is-jawdropping-20140302,0,5388152.story#axzz2vhoOpvL5" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">jaw-dropping</a>.” Facebook paid a record-shattering $19 billion for the company, despite the fact that the app is unoriginal in design and would be pretty easy to replicate. What wouldn’t be easy to replicate is the user base WhatsApp has developed: 450 million people are paying 99 cents per year to use the service.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
In other words: The biggest chunk of that payday went, not for the app or the team, but for the users—people like you and me. We could discuss the wisdom and fairness of that purchase all day long.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
But there’s another reason this staggering sum was paid out: Facebook, like much of the Silicon Valley, has too much money for its own good. Why else would it pay roughly 40 times accompanies annual earnings in order to acquire it? Bill Gates, who has many reasons to remain on friendly terms with Zuckerberg, struggled to be diplomatic. ”I hope it works out for him,” <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/16/bill-gates-zuckerberg_n_4974909.html" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">said</a> Gates. “Not everybody would’ve done it, I’ll say that for sure.”</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
You could have paid nearly half a million teachers for a year with this money. That would also provide an enormous stimulus to our struggling economy. Instead it’s going to a company with 55 engineers. Something is seriously wrong somewhere.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">4. Zuckerberg.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
That name says it all. Why wouldn’t Mark Zuckerberg pay $19 billion for WhatsApp? He probably thinks he’s worth $28.5 billion, which is what Forbes magazine <a href="http://www.forbes.com/profile/mark-zuckerberg/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">estimates</a> is his net worth. Sure, he’s an aggressive and smart businessman. But he didn’t invent the Facebook concept, and he had no idea what this website for new college students would eventually become.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
If you think Mark Zuckerberg is worth more than 523,207 teachers—who, at an average class size of 20, could teach 10 ½ million kids for a year—then your priorities are out of whack too.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">5. Hedge funders.</strong></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Hedge funders bet against companies’ success at least as much as they bet for them. Their profession has contributed to the explosive growth of non-productive financial transactions as a percentage of corporate profits, a trend that has robbed the economy of jobs and growth.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
And they make a lot of money for it. (Details <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2014/02/26/the-highest-earning-hedge-fund-managers-and-traders/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">here</a>.) Hedge funder Steve Cohen made $2.3 billion last year. Since that’s just one year’s income, it didn’t hurt him too much when he paid $1.8 billion to settle criminal insider trading charges. In fact, he came out half a billion ahead last year.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
David Tepper made $3.5 billion last year. That puts him ahead of Zuckerberg on an annualized basis. John Paulson made nearly $2 billion last year. James Simon, although officially retired, made $1.1 billion. Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates underperformed compared to the industry, but he made nearly $1 billion anyway.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
The top five hedge funders made a total of $13.4 billion among them, or nearly a quarter million teacher-years, in a single year.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
<strong style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">6. Quinn Gillespie, lobbyists</strong>.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Our unjust and inequitable economic system is only made possible because lobbyists have so much influence in Washington. Politicians and political operatives know they can look forward to a rewarding afterlife in the lobbying universe if they play their cards right—and most of them do.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
While it’s not the largest lobbying firm, Quinn Gillespie’s origins reflect the bipartisan nature of the lobbying machine. It almost sounds like a sitcom: one’s a Republican, one’s a Democrat, and together they’ll make millions!</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Jack Quinn was a Clinton insider. Ed Gillespie is a former chairman of the Republican national committee, Bush insider, and cofounded Crossroads GPS with Karl Rove. (Gillespie is on hiatus to run for the U.S. Senate in Virginia.) Their firm made a total of $160 million <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-10-top-lobbying-firms-2012-8?op=1" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; color: red; font-size: 15.555556297302246px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline;">in 2012</a>, of which $4,030,000 was reported as official lobbying.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Their income is small potatoes compared to the massive sums the billionaires on this list have been pulling down. But they are making millions off a profession that was once described as “public service.” That’s disgraceful.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
$4.030,000 for lobbying comes out to 71 ½ teachers. The city of Washington DC could sure use those teachers. What’s more, those teachers would be doing social good, not social harm.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; font-size: 16px; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline;">
Lobbyists may not be billionaires, but they make our billionaire-generating and billionaire-coddling system possible. And they do it at the expense of our social values. They may not be the unproductive billionaires who are draining the lifeblood from our economy, but lobbyists like Quinn and Gillespie are the wind beneath the billionaires’ wings.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="writerMeta" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 14.44444465637207px; font-style: italic; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 18px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<a class="byline" href="http://www.salon.com/writer/rj_eskow/" style="background: transparent; border: 0px; clear: both; color: red; display: block; font-family: BentonSansBold, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: normal !important; line-height: 24px; list-style: none; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; vertical-align: baseline;" title="More RJ Eskow.">MORE RJ ESKOW.</a><a href="http://www.alternet.org/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.alternet.org/</a></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; background: rgb(255, 255, 255); border: 0px; color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; list-style: none; margin: 15px 0px; orphans: auto; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px;">
<br /></div>
Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-26290867576443658452013-05-15T21:18:00.003-07:002013-05-15T21:21:14.071-07:00Lesser Evil Still Leads To Evil"The president prosecutes the drug war, expands the drone war, boosts
electronic spying, and justifies the targeted killing of U.S. citizens.
Now he's attacking the freedom of the press. Why does the Left tolerate
Obama's authoritarian streak?" Via <a href="http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/civil-liberties-freedom-of-press-obama-left-autocrat-ap-phone-records/519274fe02a7604706000109">HuffPost</a> Live <br />
<br />
<iframe frameborder="0" height="270" scrollable="no" src="http://embed.live.huffingtonpost.com/HPLEmbedPlayer/?segmentId=519274fe02a7604706000109" width="480"></iframe><br />Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-3611956032508991922013-03-01T13:00:00.003-08:002013-03-01T13:00:55.055-08:00Richard Wolff: Capitalism Hits the Fan<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="300" mozallowfullscreen="" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/8103146" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="400"></iframe><br />Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-54761844400713039322013-03-01T12:03:00.000-08:002013-03-01T12:04:14.228-08:00’Capitalism Hits the Fan’: A Lecture by Richard Wolff on the Economic Meltdown<a href="http://fora.tv/2010/03/03/Richard_Wolff_Capitalism_Hits_the_Fan">http://fora.tv/2010/03/03/Richard_Wolff_Capitalism_Hits_the_Fan</a>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-9081527455566884762013-03-01T11:54:00.001-08:002013-03-01T11:54:28.156-08:00Taming Capitalism Run Wild on Moyers & Company<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="300" mozallowfullscreen="" src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/60234702" webkitallowfullscreen="" width="400"></iframe><br />Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-64081157739606117742012-10-09T13:40:00.002-07:002012-10-09T13:40:27.643-07:00Obama and Romney Are the Same on Imperial Grand Strategyby <a href="http://original.antiwar.com/author/jack-a-smith/" rel="author" title="Posts by Jack A. Smith">Jack A. Smith</a>,
October 06, 2012 <br />
<br />
**THIS ARTICLE IS FROM <a href="http://original.antiwar.com/jack-a-smith/2012/10/05/obama-and-romney-are-the-same-on-imperial-grand-strategy/">ANTIWAR.COM</a><a href="http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=3326794543252686479"><span id="goog_468956981"></span><span id="goog_468956982"></span></a> **<br />
<br />
Despite the sharp charges and counter-charges about foreign policy
there are no important differences on such matters between President
Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney. The back and forth between the
candidates on international issues is largely about appearance not
substance.<br />
<br />
The <i>Washington Post</i> noted on Sept. 26 that the two candidates “made clear
this week that they share an overriding belief – American political and economic
values should triumph in the world.” Add to that uplifting phrase the implicit
words “by any means necessary,” and you have the essence of Washington’s international
endeavors.<br />
<br />
There are significant differences within the GOP’s right wing
factions – from neoconservatives and ultra nationalists to libertarians
and pragmatic realists – that make it extremely difficult for the
Republicans to articulate a comprehensive foreign/military policy. This
is why Romney confines himself to criticizing Obama’s international
record without elaborating on his own perspective, except to imply he
would do everything better than the incumbent.<br />
<br />
Only nuances divide the two ruling parties on the principal strategic
international objectives that determine the development of policy.
Washington’s main goals include:<br />
<ul>
<li> Retaining worldwide “leadership,” a euphemism for geopolitical hegemony.</li>
<li> Maintaining the unparalleled military power required to crush any other
country, using all means from drones to nuclear weapons. This is made clear
in the incumbent administration’s 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), the
2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), and the January 2012 strategic defense
guidance titled, "Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st
Century Defense."</li>
<li> Containing the rise of China’s power and influence, not only globally but
within its own East Asian regional sphere of influence, where the U.S. still
intends to reign supreme. Obama’s “pivot” to Asia is part of Washington’s
encirclement of China militarily and politically through its alliances with
key Asian-Pacific allies. In four years, according to the IMF, China’s economy
will overtake that of the U.S. – and Washington intends to have its fleets,
air bases, troops and treaties in place for the celebration.</li>
<li> Exercising decisive authority over the entire resource-rich Middle East
and adjacent North Africa. Only the Iranian and Syrian governments remain
to be toppled. (Shia Iraq, too, if it gets too close to Iran.)</li>
<li> Provoking regime change in Iran through crippling sanctions intended to
wreck the country’s economy and, with Israel, threats of war. There is no
proof Iran is constructing a nuclear weapon.</li>
<li> Seeking regime change in Syria, Shia Iran’s (and Russia’s) principal Arab
ally. Obama is giving political and material support to fractious rebel forces
in the civil war who are also supported by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey.
The U.S. interest is in controlling the replacement regime.</li>
<li> Weakening and isolating Russia as it develops closer economic and political
ties to China, and particularly when it expresses opposition to certain of
Washington’s less savory schemes, such as continuing to expand NATO, seeking
to crush Iran and Syria, and erecting anti-missile systems in Europe. In 20
years, NATO has been extended from Europe to Central Asia, adjacent to China
and former Soviet republics.</li>
<li> Continuing the over 50-year Cold War economic embargo, sanctions and various
acts of subversion against Cuba in hopes of destroying socialism in that Caribbean
Island nation.</li>
<li> Recovering at least enough hegemony throughout Latin America – nearly all
of which the U.S. dominated until perhaps 15 years ago – to undermine or remove
left wing governments in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador.</li>
<li> Significantly increasing U.S. military engagement in Africa.</li>
</ul>
Both the right/far right Republican Party and the center right
Democratic Party agree on these goals, although their language to
describe them is always decorated with inspiring rhetoric about the
triumph of American political and economic values; about spreading
democracy and good feeling; about protecting the American people from
terrorism and danger.<br />
<br />
Today’s foreign policy goals are contemporary adaptations of a
consistent, bipartisan international perspective that began to take
shape at the end of World War II in 1945. Since the implosion of the
Soviet Union ended the 45-year Cold War two decades ago – leaving the
U.S. and its imperialist ambitions as the single world superpower –
Washington protects its role as “unipolar” hegemon like a hungry dog
with a meaty bone.<br />
<br />
The people of the United States have no influence over the
fundamentals of Washington’s military objectives. Many Americans seem to
have no idea about Washington’s actual goals. As far as a large number
of voters are concerned the big national security issues in the election
boil down to Iran’s dangerous nuclear weapon; the need to stand up for
Israel; stopping China from “stealing” American jobs; and preventing a
terrorist attack on America.<br />
<br />
One reason is the ignorance of a large portion of voters about past
and present history and foreign affairs. Another is that many people
still entertain the deeply flawed myths about “American exceptionalism”
and the “American Century.” Lastly, there’s round-the-clock government
and mass media misinformation.<br />
<br />
After decades of living within an aggressive superpower it is no
oddity that even ostensibly informed delegates to the recent Republican
and Democratic political conventions engaged in passionate mass chanting
of the hyper-nationalist “USA!, USA!, USA!” when they were whipped up
by party leaders evoking the glories of killing Osama bin-Laden,
patriotism, war and the superiority of our way of life.<br />
Since Romney has no foreign policy record, and he’ll probably do
everything Obama would do only worse (and he probably won’t even win the
election) we will concentrate mainly on Obama’s foreign policy and the
pivot to China.<br />
<br />
One of President Obama’s most important military decisions this year
was a new strategic guidance for the Pentagon published Jan. 5 in a
16-page document titled “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities
for 21st Century Defense.”<br />
<br />
The new doctrine is the response by the White House and Congress to
the stagnant economy and new military considerations. It reduces the
number of military personnel and expects to lower Pentagon costs over 10
years by $487 billion, as called for by the Budget Control Act of 2011.
This amounts to a cut of almost $50 billion a year in an overall annual
Pentagon budget of about $700 billion, and most of the savings will be
in getting rid of obsolete equipment and in payrolls. This may all be
reversed by Congress.<br />
<br />
Introducing “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership” to the media, Obama declared:<br />
“As we look beyond the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan – and the end of
long-term nation-building with large military footprints – we’ll be able
to ensure our security with smaller conventional ground forces. We’ll
continue to get rid of outdated Cold War-era systems so that we can
invest in the capabilities that we need for the future, including
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, counterterrorism,
countering weapons of mass destruction and the ability to operate in
environments where adversaries try to deny us access. So, yes, our
military will be leaner, but the world must know the United States is
going to maintain our military superiority with armed forces that are
agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and
threats.”<br />
<br />
Following the president, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta declared:<br />
<br />
“As we shift the size and composition of our ground, air and naval
forces, we must be capable of successfully confronting and defeating any
aggressor and respond to the changing nature of warfare. Our strategy
review concluded that the United States must have the capability to
fight several conflicts at the same time. We are not confronting,
obviously, the threats of the past; we are confronting the threats of
the 21st century. And that demands greater flexibility to shift and
deploy forces to be able to fight and defeat any enemy anywhere. How we
defeat the enemy may very well vary across conflicts. But make no
mistake, we will have the capability to confront and defeat more than
one adversary at a time.”<br />
<br />
The Congressional Research Service summarized five key points from
the defense guidance, which it said was “written as a blueprint for the
joint force of 2020.” They are:<br />
<ol>
<li> A shift in overall focus from winning today’s wars to preparing for future
challenges.</li>
<li> A shift in geographical priorities toward the Asia and the Pacific region
while retaining emphasis on the Middle East.</li>
<li> A shift in the balance of missions toward more emphasis on projecting power
in areas in which U.S. access and freedom to operate are challenged by asymmetric
means ("anti-access") and less emphasis on stabilization operations,
while retaining a full-spectrum force.</li>
<li> A corresponding shift in force structure, including reductions in Army
and Marine Corps endstrength, toward a smaller, more agile force including
the ability to mobilize quickly. [The Army plans to cut about 50,000 from
a force of 570,000. In 2001 there were 482,000.]</li>
<li> A corresponding shift toward advanced capabilities including Special Operations
Forces, new technologies such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
(ISR) and unmanned systems, and cyberspace capabilities.</li>
</ol>
Here are the new military priorities, according to Obama’s war
doctrine (notice the omission of counter-insurgency, a previous
favorite):<br />
<ul>
<li> Engage in counter-terrorism and irregular warfare.</li>
<li>Deter and defeat aggression.</li>
<li>Project power despite anti-access/area denial challenges.</li>
<li>Counter weapons of mass destruction (WMD).</li>
<li>Operate effectively in cyberspace and space.</li>
<li>Maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent.</li>
<li>Defend the homeland and provide support to civil authorities.</li>
<li>Provide a stabilizing presence.</li>
<li>Conduct stability and counterinsurgency operations.</li>
<li>Conduct humanitarian, disaster relief, and other operations.</li>
</ul>
In an article critical of the military and titled “A Leaner, More
Efficient Empire,” progressive authors Medea Benjamin and Charles Davis
wrote:<br />
<br />
“In an age when U.S. power can be projected through private mercenary
armies and unmanned Predator drones, the U.S. military need no longer
rely on massive, conventional ground forces to pursue its imperial
agenda, a fact President Barack Obama is now acknowledging. But make no
mistake: while the tactics may be changing, the U.S. taxpayer – and poor
foreigners abroad – will still be saddled with overblown military
budgets and militaristic policies.<br />
<br />
“‘Over the next 10 years, the growth in the defense budget will
slow,’ the president told reporters, ‘but the fact of the matter is
this: It will still grow.’ In fact, he added with a touch of pride, it
‘will still be larger than it was toward the end of the Bush
administration,’ totaling more than $700 billion a year and accounting
for about half of the average American’s income tax. So much for the
Pentagon’s budget being slashed.”<br />
<br />
The Obama Administration’s so-called pivot to the Asia-Pacific
region, actually East and South Asia (including India) and the Indian
Ocean area, was unveiled last fall – first in an article in <i>Foreign Policy</i>
magazine by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton titled “America’s
Pacific Century,” then with attendant fanfare by President Obama on his
trip to Hawaii, Australia and Indonesia.<br />
<br />
The “pivot” involves attempting to establish a U.S.-initiated free
trade zone in the region, while also strengthening Washington’s ties
with a number of existing allied countries, such as Japan, South Korea,
the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand and India, among others. A few of
these allies have sharp disagreements with China about claims to small
islands in the South China Sea, a major waterway for trade and commerce.
The U.S., while saying it is neutral, is siding with its allies on this
extremely sensitive issue.<br />
<br />
Over the months it has become clear that the principal element of the
“pivot” is military, and the allies are meant to give the U.S. support
and backing for whatever transpires.<br />
<br />
The U.S. for decades has encircled China with military might – spy
planes and satellites, Navy warships cruising with thousands of
personnel nearby and in the South China Sea, 40,000 U.S. troops in
Japan, 28,000 in South Korea, 500 in the Philippines, many thousands in
Afghanistan, plus a number of Pacific island airbases.<br />
<br />
Now it turns out that the Navy is moving a majority of its cruisers,
destroyers and aircraft carrier battle groups from the Atlantic to the
Pacific. In addition, old military bases in the region are being
refurbished and new bases are under construction. Australia has granted
Obama’s request to allow a Marine base to be established in Darwin to
accommodate a force of 2,500 troops. Meanwhile Singapore has been
prevailed upon to allow the berthing of four U.S. Navy ships at the
entrance to the Malacca Straits, through which enter almost all sea
traffic between the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean, a key trade
route.<br />
<br />
An article in the Sept./Oct. 2012 <i>Foreign Affairs</i> by Andrew J. Nathan
and Andrew Scobell, titled “The Sum of Beijing’s Fears,” paints a clear picture
of American power on the coast of China:<br />
<br />
“U.S. military forces are globally deployed and technologically
advanced, with massive concentrations of firepower all around the
Chinese rim. The U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM) is the largest of the
United States’ six regional combatant commands in terms of its
geographic scope and non-wartime manpower. PACOM’s assets include about
325,000 military and civilian personnel, along with some 180 ships and
1,900 aircraft. To the west, PACOM gives way to the U.S. Central Command
(CENTCOM), which is responsible for an area stretching from Central
Asia to Egypt. Before Sept. 11, 2001, CENTCOM had no forces stationed
directly on China’s borders except for its training and supply missions
in Pakistan. But with the beginning of the ‘war on terror,’ CENTCOM
placed tens of thousands of troops in Afghanistan and gained extended
access to an air base in Kyrgyzstan.<br />
<br />
“The operational capabilities of U.S. forces in the Asia-Pacific are
magnified by bilateral defense treaties with Australia, Japan, New
Zealand, the Philippines, and South Korea and cooperative arrangements
with other partners. And to top it off, the United States possesses some
5,200 nuclear warheads deployed in an invulnerable sea, land, and air
triad. Taken together, this U.S. defense posture creates what Qian
Wenrong of the Xinhua News Agency’s Research Center for International
Issue Studies has called a “strategic ring of encirclement.”<br />
<br />
An article in <i>Foreign Policy</i> last January by Clyde Prestowitz asked:
“Why is the ‘pivot’ a mistake? Because it presumes a threat where none exists
but where the presumption could become a self-fulfilling prophecy and where
others could deal with any threats should they arise in the future. Because
it entails further expenditures far beyond what is necessary for effective defense
of the United States and its interests. And because it reduces U.S. productive
power, competitiveness, and long-term U.S. living standards by providing a kind
of subsidy for the offshoring of U.S.-based production capacity.”<br />
<br />
This development cannot be separated from the increasing economic
growth and potential of China in relation to the obvious beginning of
America’s decline. Washington may remain the world hegemon for a couple
of more decades – and Beijing is not taking one step in that direction
and may never do so. (Beijing seems to prefer a multipolar world
leadership of several nations and regional blocs, as do a number of
economically rising countries.)<br />
<br />
“Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership,” as noted above, specified that the thrust
of the Pentagon’s attention has now shifted to Asia. The most recent Quadrennial
Defense Review already has informally identified China as a possible nation-state
aggressor against which America must defend itself. The U.S. claims it is not
attempting to contain China, but why the military buildup? It cannot be aimed
at any other country in the region but China. Why also in his convention acceptance
speech did Obama brag that “We’ve reasserted our power across the Pacific and
stood up to China on behalf of our workers.”<br />
The U.S. evidently is developing war games against China. On Aug. 2
John Glaser wrote in Antiwar.com: “The Pentagon is drawing up new plans
to prepare for an air and sea war in Asia, presumably against China, in
the Obama administration’s most belligerent manifestation yet of the
so-called pivot to Asia-Pacific…. New war strategies called ‘Air-Sea
Battle’ reveal Washington’s broader goals in the region,” including a
possible war.”<br />
<br />
The Aug. 1 Washington Post reported that in the games "Stealthy
American bombers and submarines would knock out China’s long-range
surveillance radar and precision missile systems located deep inside the
country. The initial ‘blinding campaign’ would be followed by a larger
air and naval assault."<br />
<br />
Both candidates have opportunistically interjected China-bashing into
their campaigns, second only to Iran-bashing. Obama has several times
told working class audiences that China is stealing their jobs. Romney
fumes about China’s alleged currency “cheating.” Republican former
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger sharply criticized both candidates
Oct. 3 for “appealing to American suspicions of China in their
campaigns.”<br />
<br />
Kissinger, whose recent book “On China” we recommend, also wrote a piece in
the March-April <i>Foreign Affairs</i> titled “The Future of U.S.-Chinese Relations
– Conflict Is a Choice, Not a Necessity” that injects an element of understanding
into the matter.<br />
<br />
“The American debate, on both sides of the political divide, often
describes China as a ‘rising power’ that will need to ‘mature’ and learn
how to exercise responsibility on the world stage. China, however, sees
itself not as a rising power but as a returning one, predominant in its
region for two millennia and temporarily displaced by colonial
exploiters taking advantage of Chinese domestic strife and decay. It
views the prospect of a strong China exercising influence in economic,
cultural, political, and military affairs not as an unnatural challenge
to world order but rather as a return to normality. Americans need not
agree with every aspect of the Chinese analysis to understand that
lecturing a country with a history of millennia about its need to ‘grow
up’ and behave ‘responsibly’ can be needlessly grating.”<br />
<br />
Clearly, the Obama Administration is opposed to modern China even becoming
“predominant in its region” once again, much less in the world. At this stage
Washington is predominant in East Asia, and between its military power and subordinate
regional allies it is not prepared to move over even within China’s own sphere.
No one can predict how this will play out in 20 or 30 years, of course.Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-18676864167848953572012-10-09T13:34:00.005-07:002012-10-09T13:34:54.462-07:00The Coming Age of Austerity<span></span><br />
<div class="mainauthorstyle">
<span>by SHAMUS COOKE</span></div>
<span>
<div class="main-text">
<br />
**THIS ARTICLE IS FROM <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/10/09/the-coming-age-of-austerity/">COUNTERPUNCH.ORG</a> **<br />
<br />
The coast is clear, the media tells us; economic disaster has been
averted. The Euro Zone is finally stable and the U.S. economy is
recovering. Whew!<br />
<br />
Why, then, are government policies internationally still pursuing
extremist measures? In the U.S., a third round of excess money printing
—called Quantitative Easing — began recently in which banks are directly
profiting by unloading their toxic mortgages on the Federal Reserve’s
balance sheet (another backdoor bailout paid by taxpayers).<br />
<br />
After the U.S. presidential election, both Democrats and Republicans
are committed to different versions of historic cuts to social services,
education, Medicare, unemployment benefits, and very likely Social
Security. This bi-partisan plan is often referred to as a “grand
bargain,” the details of which both parties are still haggling over.<br />
<br />
In Europe things are no better. After the Euro Zone central bank
promised investors its full backing to bailout all Euro Zone members —
by printing money — the world economy sighed a heavy relief. But still
the Euro Zone — along with the U.S. — is pursuing a two-pronged solution
for an extreme economic crisis: austerity measures and the
less-discussed “structural reforms.”<br />
What are these policies? Austerity is simple enough: government cuts
to social spending, health care, education, pensions, etc. — to balance
heavily indebted public budgets (at the expense of working people,
rather than taxing the rich and corporations). Austerity can also be
achieved through privatization, where once publicly run
programs/facilities are sold cheaply to private firms to make a profit,
thus taking the cost off the government’s budget.<br />
<br />
Structural reforms on the other hand are meant to boost economic
(corporate) growth, by government intervention in commodity markets —
most commonly the labor market. It’s called structural reform because
markets are usually relatively stable. For example, the labor market is
deep-rooted in powerful social forces — wages, benefits, and working
conditions are heavily influenced by unions, who use their organization
and strike threat to pressure corporations and governments to pay living
wages. Non-union workers benefit directly by the unions’ ability to
alter the national labor market, since non-union companies have to
compete with union companies for workers, who naturally go where wages
are higher. Professional, higher-paid workers benefit too, since society
expects them to get higher wages than, say a carpenter.<br />
<br />
In Europe, structural reforms targeting the labor market — alongside
austerity measures — are rousing the unions and broader community into
the streets with massive demonstrations: Spain, Portugal, Greece, and
other countries are fighting reforms that politicians are
euphemistically calling “labor market flexibility.” This simply means
that unions will be undermined by their inability to protect workers’
jobs, making firing easier (“flexibility”), which results in compelling
workers into accepting lower wages and benefits.<br />
<br />
The pro-corporate Economist magazine reports about Portugal:<br />
<blockquote>
“With his decision to finance a reduction in company
[corporate] costs through a sharp cut in workers’ take-home pay, Pedro
Passos Coelho, Portugal’s prime minister, appears to have taken reform
past the limit of what is deemed acceptable by large sections of the
electorate.”</blockquote>
And France:<br />
<blockquote>
“… [President] Hollande has given union leaders and
bosses until December to negotiate [anti-union] labor-market changes. On
the table are various options, including making it possible for firms
[corporations] to reduce hours and salaries in a downturn against a
guarantee of job security, along the lines introduced by [Germany's
prime minister]… in 2003.”</blockquote>
And Spain:<br />
<blockquote>
“… the new [labor] law makes it easier and cheaper to lay
off workers. For most firms, maximum lay-off payments [unemployment
benefits] will be reduced from 42 months’ pay to 12 months… it will
hugely boost business confidence.”</blockquote>
Reducing unemployment benefits is a very popular labor market
structural reform for the 1%, since it makes workers more desperate for
work, and thus more accepting of low-wage jobs — consequently lowering
workers’ power in the labor market overall, as wages are lowered
nationally.<br />
<br />
And while Europe’s austerity and structural reforms are on the front
page of international media — due to the giant protests and general
strikes against them — the exact same policies have been pursued by the
U.S. with barely a murmur. Were it not for the labor upsurges in
Wisconsin and more recently Chicago, these policies would be completely
off the public’s radar.<br />
<br />
The Wisconsin uprising was in response to a labor-market structural
reform pursued by Republicans, denying unions bargaining rights —
effectively destroying the union. Democrats, however, are pursuing
anti-labor structural reforms — weakening unions — as national policy
also, though less directly, by demanding that unions across the country
take massive concessions in wages and benefits — a slower, yet more
effective form of labor market restructuring.<br />
<br />
The teachers in Chicago went on strike against another form of
anti-labor structural reform pursued by both Democrats and Republicans.
The media-hype around “firing bad teachers” is really a labor-market
reform in disguise; the real intention is to bust unions, who are only
able to stay strong by their ability to protect the jobs of their
members (of course there already exists ways to fire bad teachers).<br />
<br />
Teacher merit pay is yet another labor reform measure aimed to weaken
unions, since it effectively lowers wages by preventing raises (there
is zero evidence that merit pay raises education standards, or that
charter schools outperform public schools). It means that every
teacher’s salary is negotiated individually, and it allows management to
punish its critics by denying them merit pay raises.<br />
<br />
The teachers are especially targeted in the U.S. because they are the
strongest union in the country, due to their numbers, organization, and
connections to the community. If they are forced to give “structural”
concessions, other unions will be heavily pressured to do so, and thus
the labor market will be altered to the benefit of the corporations.<br />
<br />
The labor reform attacks — combined with austerity budget cuts — are
happening in different forms on a city, state, and federal level with
the full backing of the Democrats and Republicans (there is no “debate”
in the presidential election about education policy). Thus, if not for
the Wisconsin and Chicago struggles, there would be little social
consciousness around these issues.<br />
The reasons that austerity and structural adjustment have not
produced a Europe-like movement yet is because most labor unions have
increasingly accepted these concessions without putting up a real fight.
Many labor leaders would simply rather accept these policies, since
fighting them would put them in conflict with their “friends,” the
Democratic politicians pursuing these anti-labor policies.<br />
<br />
Hopefully, the post-Occupy movement can show the labor movement the
way forward. On November 3rd there will be protest demonstrations
against austerity in a number of cities across the country. These
protests are targeting the ongoing state by state cuts — and federal
post-election cuts — to education, transportation, health care, social
programs, and public-sector workers. The protests are challenging the
very concept of austerity, as working people refuse to pay for the
crisis created by the rich and corporations. There is a potential for
these protest demonstrations to teach the American public the word
“austerity,” assuming they are large enough and connect with the broader
community that directly experiences these policies.<br />
<br />
Regardless of the results of November 3, demonstrations about the
austerity issue in the U.S. will inevitably continue, since even
mainstream economists mostly agree that there will be no return to the
pre-recession economy. The policies of austerity and structural reform —
along with war — are long-term survival strategies of capitalism, which
is evolving to survive a global-wide crisis of corporate growth rates
by creating a “new normal” of social expectations: lower wages and fewer
social programs.<br />
<br />
The first step in fighting these measures is mobilizing working
people and the broader community in massive Europe-like
demonstrations. This tactic educates the whole nation about the issues,
which would otherwise remain in the dark. Once the 99% is in the streets
together screaming collective demands with a united voice, the movement
will decide how best to act, whether it be the general strikes or new
political parties that have emerged in Europe.<br />
<br />
The U.S. post-election austerity surprises will give new
opportunities for millions of people to get into the streets. They will
no longer be able or willing to remain ignorant about the nation’s new
normal.<br />
<br />
<em><strong>Shamus Cooke</strong> is a social service worker, trade unionist, and writer for Workers Action (<a href="http://www.workerscompass.org/">www.workerscompass.org</a>). He can be reached at <a href="mailto:shamuscooke@gmail.com">shamuscooke@gmail.com</a></em><br />
</div>
</span>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-38262387510799267712012-09-20T12:02:00.003-07:002012-09-20T12:02:57.071-07:00Frack the World! <a href="http://www.sfweekly.com/2012-09-19/news/fracking-environment-natural-gas-disaster-energy-texas-pennsylvania-new-york-earthquakes-disaster/">http://www.sfweekly.com/2012-09-19/news/fracking-environment-natural-gas-disaster-energy-texas-pennsylvania-new-york-earthquakes-disaster/</a>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-47955398464516260292012-07-25T10:13:00.000-07:002012-07-25T10:13:27.109-07:00World in Serious Trouble on Food FrontJuly 24, 2012<br />
Lester R. Brown <br />
<br />
In the early spring of 2012, U.S. farmers were on their way to planting some 96 million acres in corn, the most in 75 years. A warm early spring got the crop off to a great start. Analysts were predicting the largest corn harvest on record.<br />
<br />
The United States is the leading producer and exporter of corn, the world's feed grain. At home, corn accounts for four-fifths of the U.S. grain harvest. Internationally, the U.S. corn crop exceeds China's rice and wheat harvests combined. Among the big three grains – corn, wheat, and rice – corn is now the leader, with production well above that of wheat and nearly double that of rice.The corn plant is as sensitive as it is productive. Thirsty and fast-growing, it is vulnerable to both extreme heat and drought. At elevated temperatures, the corn plant, which is normally so productive, goes into thermal shock.<br />
<br />
As spring turned into summer, the thermometer began to rise across the Corn Belt. In St. Louis, Missouri, in the southern Corn Belt, the temperature in late June and early July climbed to 100 degrees Fahrenheit or higher 10 days in a row. For the past several weeks, the Corn Belt has been blanketed with dehydrating heat.<br />
<br />
Weekly drought maps published by the University of Nebraska show the drought-stricken area spreading across more and more of the country until, by mid-July, it engulfed virtually the entire Corn Belt. Soil moisture readings in the Corn Belt are now among the lowest ever recorded.<br />
<br />
While temperature, rainfall, and drought serve as indirect indicators of crop growing conditions, each week the U.S. Department of Agriculture releases a report on the actual state of the corn crop. This year the early reports were promising. On May 21st, 77 percent of the U.S. corn crop was rated as good to excellent. The following week the share of the crop in this category dropped to 72 percent. Over the next eight weeks, it dropped to 26 percent, one of the lowest ratings on record. The other 74 percent is rated very poor to fair. And the crop is still deteriorating.<br />
<br />
Over a span of weeks, we have seen how the more extreme weather events that come with climate change can affect food security. Since the beginning of June, corn prices have increased by nearly one half, reaching an all-time high on July 19th.<br />
<br />
Although the world was hoping for a good U.S. harvest to replenish dangerously low grain stocks, this is no longer in the cards. World carryover stocks of grain will fall further at the end of this crop year, making the food situation even more precarious. Food prices, already elevated, will follow the price of corn upward, quite possibly to record highs.<br />
<br />
Not only is the current food situation deteriorating, but so is the global food system itself. We saw early signs of the unraveling in 2008 following an abrupt doubling of world grain prices. As world food prices climbed, exporting countries began restricting grain exports to keep their domestic food prices down. In response, governments of importing countries panicked. Some of them turned to buying or leasing land in other countries on which to produce food for themselves.<br />
<br />
Welcome to the new geopolitics of food scarcity. As food supplies tighten, we are moving into a new food era, one in which it is every country for itself.<br />
<br />
The world is in serious trouble on the food front. But there is little evidence that political leaders have yet grasped the magnitude of what is happening. The progress in reducing hunger in recent decades has been reversed. Unless we move quickly to adopt new population, energy, and water policies, the goal of eradicating hunger will remain just that.<br />
<br />
Time is running out. The world may be much closer to an unmanageable food shortage – replete with soaring food prices, spreading food unrest, and ultimately political instability– than most people realize.<br />
<br />
Lester R. Brown is President of Earth Policy Institute and author of <em>Full Planet, Empty Plates: The New Geopolitics of Food Scarcity</em>, due to be published in October 2012.<br />
<br />
Copyright © 2012 Earth Policy Institute<br />
<br />
*NOTE: This piece originally appeared in <em>The Guardian</em> on July 24, 2012.Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-60551620241337345762012-06-18T15:21:00.000-07:002012-06-18T15:21:06.946-07:00Syngenta Charged Over Covering Up Animal Deaths from GM Corn<small>June 18th, 2012</small> <br />
<br />
<em><a href="http://naturalsociety.com/syngenta-charged-over-covering-up-animal-deaths-gm-corn/">NaturalSociety</a><br />
</em><br />
<em>By Anthony Gucciardi</em><br />
<br />
In a riveting victory against genetically modified creations, a major biotech company known as Syngenta has been criminally charged for denying knowledge that its GM Bt corn actually kills livestock. What’s more is not only did the company deny this fact, but they did so in a civil court case that ended back in 2007. The charges were finally issued after a long legal struggle against the mega corp initiated by a German farmer named Gottfried Gloeckner whose dairy cattle died after eating the Bt toxin and coming down with a ‘mysterious’ illness.<br />
<br />
Grown on his own farm from 1997 to 2002, the cows on the farm were all being fed exclusively on Syngenta’s Bt 176 corn by the year 2000. It was around this time that the mysterious illnesses began to emerge among the cattle population. Syngenta paid Gloeckner 40,000 euros in an effort to silence the farmer, however a civil lawsuit was brought upon the company. Amazingly, 2 cows ate genetically modified maize (now banned in Poland over serious concerns) and died. During the civil lawsuit, however, Syngenta refused to admit that its GM corn was responsible. In fact, they went as far as to claim having no knowledge whatsoever of harm.<br />
<br />
The case was dismissed and Gloeckner, the farmer who launched the suit, was left thousands of euros in debt. And that’s not all; Gloeckner continued to lose many cows as a result of Syngenta’s modified Bt corn. After halting the use of GM feed in 2002, Gloeckner attempted a full investigation with the Robert Koch Institute and Syngenta involved. The data of this investigation is still unavailable to the public, and only examined one cow. In 2009, however, the Gloeckner teamed up with a German action group known as Bündnis Aktion Gen-Klage and to ultimately bring Syngenta to the criminal court.<span id="more-5482"></span><br />
<br />
Using the testimony of another farmer whose cows died after eating Syngenta product, Gloeckner and the team have charged the biotech giant for the death of over 65 cows, withholding knowledge of the death-link, and holding the corporation liable for not registering the cattle deaths. The team is even charging Hans-Theo Jahmann, the German head of Syngenta , personally over the withholding of knowledge.<br />
<br />
The charges bring to light just how far large biotechnology companies will go to conceal evidence linking their genetically modified products to serious harm. Monsanto, for example, has even threatened to sue the entire state of Vermont if they attempt to label its genetically modified ingredients. Why are they so afraid of the consumer knowing what they are putting in their mouths?<br />
<br />
Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/syngenta-charged-over-covering-up-animal-deaths-gm-corn/#ixzz1yABc24JjEthan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-37263859234357478962012-06-18T15:17:00.000-07:002012-06-18T15:17:24.932-07:00Vagina. Can't Say it? Don't Legislate It.<a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc5e68e9f7fdfe84250234a9d0bc90a4ce7815c0985f3fb4357" target="_blank"><img alt="Because Freedom Can't Protect Itself" border="0" height="87" src="http://image.actions.aclu.org/lib/fe9315707063007477/m/1/emailheader.jpg" width="600" /></a> <br />
<table align="right" border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="background-color: #f6f6f6; border: 1px solid rgb(204,204,204); margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 15px; width: 210px;"><tbody>
<tr> <td align="center"><br />
<a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc50feb84cf198a7467571ba44637d5ade1d5a1161d240567d0" style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://www.aclu.org/files/springboard_nat/mi-freespeech-share.jpg" width="180" /></a> <br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc52a24c20ab79fd9eedd4c58048c33ad61b451ec273cc9c648" target="_blank"><img alt="" border="0" height="40" src="http://image.actions.aclu.org/lib/fe9315707063007477/m/1/takeaction.gif" width="170" /></a></div></td> </tr>
</tbody> </table><span style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 14pt; line-height: 15pt;"></span> <div style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 15pt;"> "I'm flattered you're all so interested in my vagina. But no means no." <br />
<br />
With those words, Michigan state representative Lisa Brown told the Speaker of the House exactly what she thought of the vicious anti-choice measure he was trying to push through the legislature. <br />
<br />
Here's what happened next. <strong>She was banned from speaking as the legislation moved forward.</strong> So was another female legislator, Rep. Barb Byrum, who reportedly shouted "vasectomy" out of turn. <br />
<br />
They were silenced as the House of Representatives passed war on women legislation that could, among other things, shut down clinics that provide safe, legal abortions and end medication abortions throughout the state. <br />
<br />
Silencing female legislators is a direct violation of their First Amendment rights and limits their ability to directly serve the people they represent. We can't let it stand. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc5ecfbb11ca12994c25d4adfc29980098521fdc12e8eb07496" style="color: #005489; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Tell leaders of the Michigan Senate to protect freedom of speech and stop silencing women's voices.</a> <br />
<br />
Women deserve a seat at the table <em>especially </em>when legislation impacts our bodies and our health. Clearly we have much work to do if using an anatomically correct word causes such moral panic that it derails us from examining the larger issue: <strong>women are still being excluded from conversations about women's health. </strong> <br />
<br />
We can't legislate on reproductive health if we aren't allowed to talk about our bodies. <strong>Stand with the ACLU in declaring: If you can't say it, don't legislate it.</strong> <a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc515358a779ab8c0a10c713088e0176d192f23e6fbdc6bdd7f" style="color: #005489; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Remind leaders of the Michigan Senate to protect all of our First Amendment rights and defend women's reproductive health care.</a> </div><table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0"><tbody>
<tr> <td align="left" valign="top"> <img src="https://www.aclu.org/files/springboard_nat/headshot-karymoss.jpg" /></td> <td align="left" valign="top"><div style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 15pt;"> Thanks for taking action,<br />
<img src="https://www.aclu.org/files/springboard_nat/karymoss-sig.PNG" /><br />
Kary Moss<br />
Executive Director, ACLU of Michigan</div></td></tr>
</tbody></table><div style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 15pt;"> P.S. — This isn't the first time House majority leadership has denied women a voice on the issues that impact us the most. During a committee hearing last week, no woman — nearly 90 were present — was allowed to testify against the bills. Only women in support were given the time to speak out. <a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc5e3ff507d75d3f7e94d1b1b7922527f0a0819f90cdf5b9e51" style="color: #005489; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">We must send a message loud and clear: stop silencing women's voices.</a> </div><hr /> <table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0"><tbody>
<tr><td align="left" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top"> <div style="color: #005489; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 18px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left;">Spread the Word</div><div style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left;">Help by sharing this campaign with friends.</div></td> <td align="right" bgcolor="#ffffff" valign="top" width="130"><a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc5ed6020a71a7977790570857f6b7253b1fae9d731a69c1812" target="_blank"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://image.actions.aclu.org/lib/fe9315707063007477/m/1/icon-facebook-om.png" /></a> <a href="http://click.actions.aclu.org/?qs=39de641b71430bc58387f57dd0e45af89330924e3dd0b662d51c1d82aa157b3b" target="_blank"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://image.actions.aclu.org/lib/fe9315707063007477/m/1/icon-twitter-om.png" /></a> <a href="mailto:?subject=If%20you%20can%27t%20say%20it%2C%20don%27t%20legislate%20it.&body=Hi%20--%0A%0ADid%20you%20hear%20about%20this%20story%3F%20It%20was%20just%20so%20outrageous%20I%20had%20to%20share%20it%20with%20you%21%0A%0A-------------------%0A%0A%22I%27m%20flattered%20you%27re%20all%20so%20interested%20in%20my%20vagina.%20But%20no%20means%20no.%22%0A%0AWith%20those%20words%2C%20Michigan%20state%20representative%20Lisa%20Brown%20told%20the%20Speaker%20of%20the%20House%20exactly%20what%20she%20thought%20of%20the%20vicious%20anti-choice%20measure%20he%20was%20trying%20to%20push%20through%20the%20legislature.%0A%0AHere%27s%20what%20happened%20next.%20She%20was%20banned%20from%20speaking%20as%20the%20legislation%20moved%20forward.%20So%20was%20another%20female%20legislator%2C%20Rep.%20Barb%20Byrum%2C%20who%20reportedly%20shouted%20%22vasectomy%22%20out%20of%20turn.%0A%0AThey%20were%20silenced%20as%20the%20House%20of%20Representatives%20passed%20war%20on%20women%20legislation%20that%20could%2C%20among%20other%20things%2C%20shut%20down%20clinics%20that%20provide%20safe%2C%20legal%20abortions%20and%20end%20medication%20abortions%20throughout%20the%20state.%20%20%0A%0ASilencing%20female%20legislators%20is%20a%20direct%20violation%20of%20their%20First%20Amendment%20Rights%20and%20limits%20their%20ability%20to%20directly%20serve%20the%20people%20they%20represent.%20%20We%20can%27t%20let%20it%20stand.%0A%0ARemind%20leaders%20of%20the%20Michigan%20Senate%20to%20protect%20all%20of%20our%20First%20Amendment%20rights%20and%20defend%20women%27s%20reproductive%20health%20care.%20%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fssl.capwiz.com%2Faclu%2Fissues%2Falert%2F%3Falertid%3D61470781%26type%3DCU%3Fms%3Deml_120615_mi_freespeech_eml" target="_blank"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://image.actions.aclu.org/lib/fe9315707063007477/m/1/icon-envelope-om.png" /></a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-61526065979835464752012-04-20T10:04:00.001-07:002012-04-20T10:05:05.332-07:00The horrific ramifications of the Gulf oil spill<div class="editorsNote">This piece originally appeared on <a href="http://www.alternet.org/" target="_blank">AlterNet</a>.</div><br />
Almost two full years after the BP oil spill, a panel of experts gathered at the 17th annual Tulane Environmental Law Summit, to present the continuing impacts of the BP Oil Spill. That spill began with the April 20, 2010, explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling unit used by BP 40 miles off the Louisiana coast. Eleven men lost their lives. The resulting spill of oil into the Gulf of Mexico stands as the largest oil spill in U.S. history and the second largest environmental disaster in this country to date besides the nearly decade-long Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Scientists at the summit presented recent photographs of shrimp with no eyes and fish with cancerous tumors born long after the gulf was declared “safe” for fishing.<br />
<br />
It turns out that testing water and fish flesh under the surface oil after the spill was not very telling about long-term impacts as oil and water don’t mix and the chronic, toxic impacts were delayed until long after BP was put in charge of the “cleanup.” When BP sprayed chemical dispersants containing a slew of toxic heavy metals including arsenic, the oil didn’t magically disappear. It sank into the sediment. Disturbingly, the allowable levels set by the government for the toxins in our seafood are based on health impacts for a 176-pound adult eating less than two medium shrimp a day. The testing is for one chemical out of a crude oil mixture containing thousands of chemicals. No synergistic effects are considered. This in no way protects children, fetuses, people who weigh less than 176 pounds or anyone who eats seafood on a daily basis like the folks here on the Gulf Coast. <br />
<br />
Dr. Andrew Whitehead, Ph.D., associate professor, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, who is studying the BP spill and has reviewed much of the scientific studies of the Exxon Valdez spill, explained that stock declines of species may take several years to develop as reproduction is impacted in successive generations and across species. The Exxon Valdez spill is now known to be responsible for the decline of many species, including marine mammals, marine birds, and fishes such as pink salmon and herring. Though we have a take on the immediate acute impacts of the BP spill on animals caught in the oil, the chronic ultimate impacts of the BP spill are still unknown. But we do know that the killifish, the most abundant forage fish for the bigger fish in Gulf Coast marshes, are being affected. Fish from oiled marshes show signs of direct toxicity and reproductive impairment. Dr. Whitehead’s experiments involving exposures to oiled sediments, done in collaboration with colleague Dr. Fernando Galvez, show that killifish embryos are taking longer to develop or don’t hatch at all. They are being born with malformed hearts and hearts that may not function properly when they mature. And as the impacts from the spill on the fish bioaccumulate and propagate across generations, liability is harder to prove without good and strategic scientific study that sadly is harder to fund.<br />
<br />
But some impacts are being felt now, especially for sediment dwelling seafood. Current reports from fisherman up and down the coast are startling. The oyster harvest for 2010 was the worst in more than four decades and oystermen continue to report catches down as much as 75 percent. Crab catches are in steep decline. Brown shrimp production is down two-thirds. And the white shrimp season was even worse, leading to descriptions of “worst in memory” and “nonexistent.” This from the region that before the spill provided 40 percent of the nation’s seafood.<br />
<br />
Dr. Patricia Williams, Ph.D., Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology, Associate Professor, Coordinator of Toxicology Research Laboratories, Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of New Orleans, spoke at the summit about what she sees as a failure to properly assess the impact of the spill on seafood and on human health. She said:<br />
<blockquote>In 1996, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration acknowledged that direct measurement of tissue for PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) concentrations generally does not provide a useful indicator of exposure of fish to PAHs from petroleum spills. Regardless, an extremely expensive seafood testing program was launched using this method. Testing included only 13 PAH parent compounds out of 200 PAHs present in crude oil. PAHs act on each other resulting in greater toxicity than expected from a single PAH (synergism). The synergistic nature of the PAHs were ignored in interpretation of the results. Additionally, the Levels of Concern were calculated for a 176 pound individual. This does not address toddlers and children or the developing fetus and placental transfer. The public was not warned of these deficiencies in the seafood testing program.</blockquote>Dr. Williams explained that “PAHs are endocrine disruptors that interfere with the normal blood-borne hormones (e.g., estrogen and testosterone) that are responsible for the regulation of reproductive and developmental processes. Only very low amounts of chemicals are needed to disrupt the normal endocrine balance of both humans and animals. Evidence of reproduction imbalance is seen in the second generation of white shrimp in the 2011 harvest. Shrimp were harvested with defective eye stalks, pleopods, and pereiopods. Such anatomical defects are occurring in the markedly reduced white shrimp population in the Gulf and warn of endocrine dysfunction that could result in the loss of the species.”<br />
<br />
Furthermore, “The heavy metals known to be present in crude oil are being ignored in the testing of seafood. Metal toxicity can produce neurobehavioral abnormalities in sea life such as: alterations in avoidance or attraction responses; critical swimming speed; changes in social interactions (e.g. aggression), reproduction, feeding, and predator avoidance; food foraging with reduced feeding ability; loss or orientation in swimming and changes in schooling behavior. Heavy metal testing in BP Oil clean-up workers has documented increased arsenic levels in 24 hour urine specimens.”<br />
<br />
Finally, Dr. Williams warned that “The future chronic health effects from consumption of contaminated seafood and biomagnification along the food chain are yet to be realized in both sea life and humans. Chronic effects may take years to present and may elude an analysis of their causal origins. ”<br />
<br />
On the second day of the summit, a settlement between private plaintiffs and BP was announced in the press. This settlement does not resolve the government cases, either civil or criminal, against the responsible parties. But the settlement of the private case raises the question whether the government prosecutions will be resolved without a trial and without jail time for executives ultimately responsible for the deaths of 11 workers and severe and ongoing environmental and economic impacts on the region. The summit attendees were abuzz with speculation about what will happen in the federal and State of Louisiana cases.<br />
<br />
In Louisiana, petroleum is king. This state is the third largest producer of petroleum in America, Louisiana is responsible for more than one-quarter of the nation’s natural gas production, and Louisiana is the third leading refiner of petroleum in the country. In addition, the state makes over 600 petroleum products making it the second in the nation in primary production of petrochemicals. The 20-mile stretch on the Mississippi from New Orleans to Baton Rouge known as “The Cancer Corridor” pumps out one-quarter of the chemicals made in America. Louisiana leads the United States in release of toxic chemicals into the environment. The seven-parish industrial corridor has the highest density of petrochemical industries in the nation and possibly the world.<br />
<br />
All this money in petroleum has a huge impact on politics in Louisiana, just as it does on a national and international level. It’s probably impossible to get elected to any Louisiana office without courting petroleum dollars and making campaign promises to that industry. A visit to the petroleum friendly website for the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources reveals the <a href="http://www.louisianaeconomicdevelopment.com/downloads/LED_Oil_Gas.pdf" target="_blank">following section</a> titled “Legacy Liability Reform.”<br />
<br />
This “Legacy Liability Reform” is less likely to ensure any protection for Louisiana’s resources or its citizens than it is to assure petroleum companies that Louisiana and its resources are theirs for the taking. The reform is code for “don’t worry about liability because immunity for really bad stuff is all part of the deal for investing in Louisiana.” Oh, by the way, the Louisiana courts have been very protective historically of petroleum interests as well.<br />
<br />
From the 1950s on, drilling for oil and gas on federal lands and waters has produced the second largest source of revenue for the federal government besides taxes. This has led to a rather cozy relationship between the federal government and those corporations that extract petroleum here. Let us not forget that since the inception of the Minerals Management Service (now renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement to emphasize what it should be doing) has been involved in numerous scandals. For example, in 1990, MMS employees were linked to prostitution, and in 2008 the Department of Interior’s inspector general reported that MMS employees were engaged in both drug use and sexual activity with employees from the very energy firms they were to be regulating. This wasn’t just the foxes guarding the chicken coop, but the foxes actually in bed doing lines of coke with the chickens.<br />
<br />
Clint Guidry, president, Louisiana Shrimp Association, spoke at the summit about the political ramifications of the spill and the unlikelihood of real justice coming from the government case. Mr. Guidry had worked for BP earlier in his career like so many Louisiana men have. He knows intimately both the oil industry and the fishing industry. When the spill happened, Louisiana shrimping was devastated. First, Guidry lobbied for jobs for all the shrimpers when the fisheries closed. Then he fought for job site safety for the workers and community residents impacted by the cleanup. Guidry’s role became that of witness to the harms on fisherman response workers when they began to suffer from being exposed to aerial application of the chemical dispersant and being downwind from burn sites of the surface oil. For instance, on May 26 seven shrimpers from the offshore response crew were admitted to West Jefferson Hospital with chemical poisoning. Two days later, after Obama’s May 27 visit to Grand Isle where he was photographed picking up tar balls, two more shrimpers were airlifted to West Jefferson Hospital for emergency medical treatment, also for chemical poisoning. Guidry met with the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, the U.S. Coast Guard, the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety, and with other government representatives from the local to the federal including Secretaries Napolitano and Salazar and U.S. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.<br />
<br />
Mr. Guidry still has the following unresolved questions:<br />
<ol><li>Why did we allow people who caused the oil spill to be in charge of the cleanup? Everything they did was to limit liability, not to protect the environment, the resources or the people.</li>
<li>How could the government announce on Aug. 5, 2010, that suddenly 75 percent of the oil had disappeared? Corporations run this country and they operate under the Golden Rule: Who holds the gold makes the rule.</li>
<li>According to statements made by Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Chairman Garret Graves, BP is choosing the direction of the environmental damage assessment. Shouldn’t the Oil Spill Recovery fund be administered independently so it could fund real scientists like Dr. Whitehead?</li>
<li>Oil companies are good at covering up spills and sinking the oil with additional chemicals, but they are no good at cleaning up spills. If we are allowing these companies to drill in the Gulf, shouldn’t they be required to have the technology to prevent disasters and to clean them up? They don’t.</li>
<li>Even after the largest loss of life and oil, no laws have been changed. Eleven men are dead but I don’t believe anybody will go to jail. The government is the keeper of the record of the criminal investigation and if they settle the case, the public will never see that information. If the record is not made public in a trial, how do we learn from this spill?</li>
<li>I’m a third generation fisherman. We were the first environmentalists because if you don’t take care of the environment, it doesn’t take care of you. I love wildlife. The spill has devastated wildlife. What price do you put on a dead dolphin?</li>
<li>The head of Minerals Management Service at the time of the BP disaster came from big oil. She was fired by Obama and MMS was split up but no one else was fired. Is that enough house cleaning? Can these people keep us safe when they have failed in the past?</li>
</ol>As the federal government and affected states including Louisiana move toward trial or settlement, we should all be asking these questions.<br />
<br />
How will the government cases be resolved? Potential penalties of more than $17 billion for environmental violations remain on the books for BP. Peter Lehner, executive director of Natural Resources Defense Counsel writes in his <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/plehner/bp_settles_with_plaintiffs_but.html" target="_blank">blog</a>, “How the remainder of the case pans out says a lot about the future of energy in this country. Will the government allow BP, and the rest of the oil industry, to continue business as usual with nothing more than a slap on the wrist? Or will the company be put on trial and held accountable for its actions? Will the penalties be severe enough to make the oil industry clean up its act? BP reported profits of $21.7 billion in 2011, nearly 3 times the estimated cost of its settlement with private parties in the Gulf.”<br />
And one question looms even larger than the spill, the resulting legal cases or even BP profits: How can we establish a separation between the oil industry and our government?Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3326794543252686479.post-49760984552621468422012-03-05T08:20:00.000-08:002012-03-05T08:20:30.960-08:00Wall Street’s Secret Spy Center, Run for the 1% by NYPD » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names<a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/02/06/wall-streets-secret-spy-center-run-for-the-1-by-nypd/#.T1TnbKfmLOc.blogger">Wall Street’s Secret Spy Center, Run for the 1% by NYPD » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names</a><br /><span style="font-size:-1;">"The Wall Street firms that were involuntarily bailed out by the 99% are now policing the 99%.</span>"<br /><span style="font-size:-1;">"...</span><span style="font-size:-1;">the same firms under investigation in 50 states for mortgage and foreclosure fraud and widely credited with causing the Nation’s economic collapse.</span>"Ethan Shttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10808171480607232174noreply@blogger.com0